2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-007-0386-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning, retention and coding of nest-associated visual cues by the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments, experienced foragers were confronted with an altered environment and consequently had to adapt their behavior to the new conditions. Faced with an artificial landmark array consisting of four cylinders, the Australian desert ant M. bagoti gradually increased its search performance for the nest on a test field when trained with a different number of trials over different numbers of days (Narendra et al, 2007). As C. fortis did in our replacement experiment, the proportion of ants crossing the fictive nest entrance between the landmarks increased with more experience (Narendra et al, 2007).…”
Section: Novel Learning and Re-learning Exhibit Similar Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these experiments, experienced foragers were confronted with an altered environment and consequently had to adapt their behavior to the new conditions. Faced with an artificial landmark array consisting of four cylinders, the Australian desert ant M. bagoti gradually increased its search performance for the nest on a test field when trained with a different number of trials over different numbers of days (Narendra et al, 2007). As C. fortis did in our replacement experiment, the proportion of ants crossing the fictive nest entrance between the landmarks increased with more experience (Narendra et al, 2007).…”
Section: Novel Learning and Re-learning Exhibit Similar Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Faced with an artificial landmark array consisting of four cylinders, the Australian desert ant M. bagoti gradually increased its search performance for the nest on a test field when trained with a different number of trials over different numbers of days (Narendra et al, 2007). As C. fortis did in our replacement experiment, the proportion of ants crossing the fictive nest entrance between the landmarks increased with more experience (Narendra et al, 2007). Furthermore, the search time of the Namibian desert ant (Ocymyrmex robustior) until entering the nest decreased significantly from day to day when the entrance of a nest in a landmark-free environment had been furnished with two artificial cylinders (Wehner and Müller, 2010).…”
Section: Novel Learning and Re-learning Exhibit Similar Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space limitations are eliminated, and there are a large number of environmental cues that can be experimentally manipulated. Systematic, long-term, and creative field research on wild birds (e.g., Healy & Hurly, 2004) and invertebrates like ants (e.g., Graham & Cheng, 2009;Narendra, Sulikowski, & Cheng, 2007;Wystrach, Beugnon, & Cheng, 2012) and bees (e.g., Menzel et al, 2005) has broadened our understanding of the range of species exhibiting complex spatial abilities and, even more important, elucidated the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved.…”
Section: Studying Comparative Cognition In the Wildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 This result seems to confirm the evidence of a number of studies in many species that investigated the reliance on individual landmarks or subsets of them, after successful training with a landmark array: spatial search may turn out to be based either on the entire configuration or on individual landmarks or on parts of the array. 15,[24][25][26][27] Importantly, results of experiments carried out in invertebrates indicate that snapshot-matching mechanisms depending on the retinal projection of the landmarks might account for the ability to orient also with reference to a landmark array, because the search patterns observed after expansion tests crucially depend upon the fact that landmark size is left unaltered or it is accordingly expanded during the tests [28][29][30] ( Figure 4). If, on the one hand, the sensory mechanisms of landmark-based orientation are still debated, on the functional side the utilization of arrays of landmarks has obvious advantages.…”
Section: Nestmentioning
confidence: 99%