2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.12.503783
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations

Abstract: Measuring the phenotypic effect of treatments on cells through imaging assays is an efficient and powerful way of studying cell biology, and requires computational methods for transforming images into quantitative data that highlights phenotypic outcomes. Here, we present an optimized strategy for learning representations of treatment effects from high-throughput imaging data, which follows a causal framework for interpreting results and guiding performance improvements. We use weakly supervised learning (WSL)… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate performance on test wells never seen during the model’s training suggests that the model was not leveraging well-specific features for its learning, which can be a confounder in microscopy 34 . Furthermore, we ensured that each MOA’s test set wells were spread across multiple plates (Figure 2D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate performance on test wells never seen during the model’s training suggests that the model was not leveraging well-specific features for its learning, which can be a confounder in microscopy 34 . Furthermore, we ensured that each MOA’s test set wells were spread across multiple plates (Figure 2D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present a MOA determination method spanning hundreds of MOAs that showed efficacy on two independent datasets: 1) the Joint Undertaking in Morphological Profiling (JUMP1) pilot dataset 30 encompassing 176 MOAs 2) the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) dataset 31,32 encompassing 424 MOAs. We compared our method called MOAProfiler (MP) with CP as well as a deep learning based method called DeepProfiler (DP) 33,34 . We present MP as an open-source and readily available tool for deep phenotypic profiling of Cell Painting images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress toward general purpose deep learning frameworks for HCS have been driven by weakly-supervised learning and more recently by self-supervised learning (SSL). In weakly-supervised learning 9,21 , perturbation metadata (i.e. the perturbation applied to each well) is used to label HCS images and train supervised deep learning models.…”
Section: Machine Learning Use Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach relies on weakly supervised learning [47,48] since we train models to predict the experimental perturbation in each well, without validating that each treatment induces a unique visual phenotype (N.B. : such validation is likely impossible).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%