2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43588-020-00002-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning properties of ordered and disordered materials from multi-fidelity data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the active data mining effort of RES 3 T (https://www.hzdr.de/db/RES3T.login) contains 3172 references and includes reactions between 147 minerals and 148 ligands and a total of 7062 reaction constants that span across all known surface complexation models. ML-empowered natural language processing and automated data discovery/extraction from diverse literatureincreasingly used in chemical and material sciences 4,5,[7][8][9][10][11] can similarly transform data utilization in the Earth sciences to improve ESP.…”
Section: Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the active data mining effort of RES 3 T (https://www.hzdr.de/db/RES3T.login) contains 3172 references and includes reactions between 147 minerals and 148 ligands and a total of 7062 reaction constants that span across all known surface complexation models. ML-empowered natural language processing and automated data discovery/extraction from diverse literatureincreasingly used in chemical and material sciences 4,5,[7][8][9][10][11] can similarly transform data utilization in the Earth sciences to improve ESP.…”
Section: Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The CGCNN and its variants exhibit similar accuracy in predicting formation enthalpy, with mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.03-0.04 eV/atom. [27][28][29][30] For structure and stability predictions, it is imperative that the model is able to (1) predict the total energy of both GS and higher-energy structures with similar accuracy and (2) distinguish energetically favorable (low-energy) structures from those with higher energy. The CGCNN models discussed above are trained primarily on ICSD structures that are GS or near-GS structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The challenges of AI for materials science are extensive, making acceleration of materials discovery a formidable task that requires advancing the frontier of AI. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Materials discovery embodies the convergence of limited data, data dispersed over multiple domains, and multi-property prediction, motivating commensurate integration of AI methods to collectively address these challenges, as demonstrated by the Hierarchical Correlation Learning for Multi-property Prediction (H-CLMP, pronounced "H-Clamp") framework introduced herein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%