2018
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.10.00a298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Process for Reducing Uncertainties on Network Parameters and Design Margins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that S1 includes all the 11 features, whereas S2 excludes the features characterizing the nearest neighbor lightpaths. However, if we focus on the AUC of "near to threshold" instances, results obtained in scenario S1 are slightly higher, which leads us to conclude that information on the closest neighbors does provide some insights for classification of the instances with BER close to T , as intuition would suggest 5 .…”
Section: Analysis Of Feature Relevancementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that S1 includes all the 11 features, whereas S2 excludes the features characterizing the nearest neighbor lightpaths. However, if we focus on the AUC of "near to threshold" instances, results obtained in scenario S1 are slightly higher, which leads us to conclude that information on the closest neighbors does provide some insights for classification of the instances with BER close to T , as intuition would suggest 5 .…”
Section: Analysis Of Feature Relevancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…An alternative approach to QoT prediction relies on sensing the QoT of already deployed lightpaths by means of optical performance monitors (OPMs) [4] installed at the receiver side and on exploiting the knowledge extracted from field data to predict the QoT of unestablished lightpaths [5]. To this aim, different Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been recently investigated, e.g., network kriging [6], Case Based Reasoning [7], and neural networks [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A database-oriented approach is proposed also in [42] to reduce uncertainties on network parameters and design margins, where field data are collected by a software defined network controller and stored in a central repository. Then, a QTool is used to produce an estimate of the field-measured Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) based on educated guesses on the (unknown) network parameters and such guesses are iteratively updated by means of a gradient descent algorithm, until the difference between the estimated and the field-measured SNR falls below a predefined threshold.…”
Section: A Quality Of Transmission Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, ML-PLM can reach better performances and makes the model suitable for a dynamic network. In [51], gradient decent is used to correct the deviations of the input parameters for the QoT estimators. This method takes advantage of back-propagation algorithms embedded in many neural networks, which successfully reduces the uncertainty of models.…”
Section: Ai-based Qot Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%