2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
355
0
35

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 453 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
11
355
0
35
Order By: Relevance
“…manipulating with the hands, pressing buttons, and so on) and receive their feedback and results directly in visual or audio ways [12] [13]. Nevertheless, there are some constraints in hands-on laboratories, especially in engineering and science fields, such as time limitation, safety, increasing number of students, and limited number of available laboratories, among others.…”
Section: Remote Laboratories (Rls)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…manipulating with the hands, pressing buttons, and so on) and receive their feedback and results directly in visual or audio ways [12] [13]. Nevertheless, there are some constraints in hands-on laboratories, especially in engineering and science fields, such as time limitation, safety, increasing number of students, and limited number of available laboratories, among others.…”
Section: Remote Laboratories (Rls)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction in RLs can be similar to that happening in the handson laboratories. The only difference is that the experiment in hands-on laboratory is performed physically, meaning, the students must be inside the laboratory, handling the real equipment, while in RLs, the students can perform the experiment from anywhere and at anytime [12].…”
Section: Remote Laboratories (Rls)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is still some controversy about web-based laboratories efficacy [6], a recently and exhaustive study main conclusion [3] is that student learning outcome achievement is equal or higher in non-traditional simulation and remote labs versus hands-on traditional labs. Nowadays, these resources are being widely used by teachers who are aware that the educational objectives associated with each of these resources differ, as each allows the development of different competences [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of simulations and remote labs has been growing exponentially over the last decades. They provide not only an alternative and/or complementary way to develop experimental competences, but also becomes a resource that potentiates students' autonomous learning activities and supports lifelong learning [3], [4]. Furthermore, the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools can provide a stimulus for todays' generation since they have been immersed in a world infused with network and digital technologies [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%