2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2015.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning object-specific DAGs for multi-label material recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local features can be categorized into hand-crafted features-such as Markovian, illuminationinvariant texture features [21]; filter banks [22]; and wavelet filters [23]-as well as automatically extracted features, which include CNN feature vectors [24] and D-CNN models applied to texture datasets [2]. On the other hand, global featurebased methods predominantly utilize CNN or Vision Transformer models, trained on dataset formats that include the context of objects [20,25,26,27,28] and scenes [29]. These global feature methods have been shown to outperform their local counterparts, achieving test accuracies of 85.6% on the MINC dataset [20] and 87% on the Trash image dataset, making them more suitable for real-world applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local features can be categorized into hand-crafted features-such as Markovian, illuminationinvariant texture features [21]; filter banks [22]; and wavelet filters [23]-as well as automatically extracted features, which include CNN feature vectors [24] and D-CNN models applied to texture datasets [2]. On the other hand, global featurebased methods predominantly utilize CNN or Vision Transformer models, trained on dataset formats that include the context of objects [20,25,26,27,28] and scenes [29]. These global feature methods have been shown to outperform their local counterparts, achieving test accuracies of 85.6% on the MINC dataset [20] and 87% on the Trash image dataset, making them more suitable for real-world applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material recognition is a challenging problem by itself and many methods have been proposed for solving this problem [18, 35, 36]. Bell et al [18] presented a large scale dataset of materials in the wild and used learning techniques for material recognition.…”
Section: Discussion On Selecting ωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the material region is smaller than the grid division, a lot of information of the background is processed as a material resulting in a non-accurate description. In [ 27 , 28 ], the authors proposed two methods able to identify multiple materials in object surfaces without the need of segmentation. They first recognized the object class and then used correlations of material labels for such object.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%