Learning not to labour: a micro analysis of consensual male unemployment

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -The Drifters are ten long-term unemployed British men. The Drifters' unemployment is consensual: the men believe they have chosen to "not work" and rely upon welfare benefits for their socio-economic survival. The purpose of this paper is to present micro sociological analysis of the Drifters' existences which focuses upon first, exploring why the Drifters' consensual unemployment has resulted in them experiencing high levels of stigma in their everyday lives; second, analysing the Drifters' (micro) relationships with (macro) unemployment policies. Design/methodology/approach -Primary, qualitative data were elicited from the Drifters during two phases of fieldwork. In both phases of fieldwork, the author conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews and participant observation-based research with the Drifters to generate data on how the men subjectively experience and account for the intersection of consensual non-work, welfare reliance and stigma in their lives. Findings -In the pseudonymous locale where the Drifters reside (Dramen) displaying a willingness to work is -despite high rates of local unemployment -a social expectation and marker of "respectable" masculinity. By living lives of consensual non-work and welfare reliance, the Drifters violate a localised cultural code and are accordingly stigmatised. Rather than attempting to manage their stigma, the Drifters ritually indulge in secondary deviant behaviours. This amplifies the Drifters' statuses as reviled agents. The Drifters lack employment options. The Drifters have been able to successfully exploit unemployment benefits. Accordingly, the Drifters' non-work is somewhat inevitable, rather than lamentable, as many citizens in Dramen believe; and as wider current right-leaning political and media rhetoric relating to unemployment implies. Originality/value -Examinations into the lives of non-consensually unemployed males exist. However, the lives of males who are unemployed apparently consensually -i.e. out of choice -remain under-researched. This paper functions as a micro empirical corrective, which diversifies the way male unemployment in capitalist societies can be viewed; and which offers a fresh look...

Youth, enterprise and precarity: or, what is, and what is wrong with, the ‘gig economy’?

“…Lazy theories about an idle 'underclass' (e.g. Murray, 1990) had no basis in fact, but, as Giazitzoglu (2014) has also shown, discursive devices that preserve class-based respectability by deflecting stigma on to 'Others' can be popular in high-unemployment, working-class communities.…”

“…At least one of these -a designer clothes retail-business -is still trading today, almost thirty years on. 'Runners' were celebrated in the local press as the antithesis of the (alleged) 'welfare dependency' and anti-social behaviour of working-class youth (see Giazitzoglu, 2014). These were (sometimes literally) 'the poster boys' for youth enterprise; they proved people can 'make it' if they 'aim high' and 'became their own boss'.…”

The other side of coastal towns: Young men’s precarious lives on the margins of England

“…Concurrently, there is evidence of the emergence of a different version of masculinity, in response to the failure to find employment or value in other areas of everyday life. Here a narrative about failure, resignation and quiet desperation among young men who choose to withdraw from the struggle to find work is more common (Giazitzoglu, 2014; Roberts, 2013). Indeed, not only are there multiple forms of masculinities, differentiated by age, by class and by ethnicity, but for individuals and groups, masculinity is mutable and complex, and sometimes contradictory.…”

Learning the rules of the game: How is corporate masculinity learned and enacted by male professionals from nonprivileged backgrounds?

“…It also reveals the divisions between how “working‐class lads in working‐class jobs” define “working hard” in comparison with men from working‐class backgrounds employed in PSF roles. Working‐class men in working‐class roles typically see “working hard” as being rooted in physical labor, associated with industrial and manufacturing work; and see their leisure time as something earned (Giazitzoglu, 2014, p. 335). However, participants have come to see “working hard” as manifested in acts like “working late” and “delivering to clients.” There is also a sense of sacrifice associated with participants' definition of working hard: they are disciplined to do without leisure time in order to deliver in the context of their field.…”