Learning Not to Diversify: The Transformation of Graduate Business Education and the Decline of Diversifying Acquisitions

Abstract

Once a preferred strategy, corporate diversification into disparate lines of business has gradually declined in the U.S. over the past several decades. We argue that changes that occurred in a closely related domain—graduate business education—are important in understanding variation in de-diversification across firms. Building on a historical account of the transformation of business education, we explain how the rise of financial economics and agency-theoretic logic in business education changed students’ views about diversification. Nearly 20 years later, these MBA graduates rose to top decision-making positions and put the brakes on diversification. Using data on CEOs who ran 640 large U.S. corporations from 1985 to 2015, we show that CEOs who earned an MBA before the 1970s actively pursued diversification, whereas the next cohort of CEOs, who had been exposed to agency-theoretic logic in financial economics, refrained from it. We also demonstrate that the degree of managerial discretion moderated the effect of the CEO’s MBA education. Our study shows that institutional change in one domain (i.e., business education) contributed to change in another domain (i.e., corporate diversification), albeit with a considerable time lag.

The lean startup method: Early‐stage teams and hypothesis‐based probing of business ideas

“…Research finds that the background and prior experiences of early-stage team members shape the decisions and strategic decision-making processes that ventures follow (Beckman, 2006;Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1990;Lerner & Malmendier, 2013). Early teams' educational background has been found to be particularly influential, at least partly because education is typically an intense, formative experience for individuals' thinking styles and worldview (Jung & Shin, 2019). Research finds, for example, that even long after graduation, MBA students closely follow academic theories taught in business schools (Priem & Rosenstein, 2000) and surgeon-CEOs' decisions about a venture's R&D strategies are strongly shaped by their medical education (Katila, Thatchenkery, Christensen, & Zenios, 2017).…”

“…Another key gap in our understanding is the boundary conditions. Because composition of the team influences its learning approach (Jung & Shin, 2019; Katila & Shane, 2005), the team's background is particularly relevant for identifying the boundaries for the use of the method. Prior research has tied educational backgrounds to different styles of learning, for example, including some teams deciding not to engage in learning, even when provided with evidence that supports change (Hallen & Pahnke, 2016).…”

Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research

“…Such experiments could be conducted with more readily accessible samples of managers, such as executive education participants or MBA students. There are a handful of recent UET studies that have utilized mixed-methods approaches (e.g., Jung & Shin, 2018; Souitaris, Zerbinati, Peng, & Shepherd, 2020) to leverage the benefits of different research designs. This approach could be an effective way for scholars to respond to endogeneity concerns while also making progress in teasing out important mediators (e.g., Aguinis & Solarino, 2019; Tunarosa & Glynn, 2017).…”

Statistical Discrimination and the Rationalization of Stereotypes

“…As Fourcade and colleagues (2015:109) note, "Economic reasoning, expertise, and technologies permeate capitalist activities, culture (including the media and best-seller lists), and institutions." The influence of economics is well-documented in higher education, business, government, and the press (Babb 2004;Berman 2017;Ferraro et al 2005;Fourcade 2009;Jung and Shin 2019). Economic sociologists, for example, have highlighted the pervasive influence of agency theory in transforming corporate behaviors and structures over the past four decades (Dobbin and Jung 2010) and suggested that some economic theories come to function as behavioral prescriptions and scripts rather than as mere descriptions of how economic agents behave (Jung and Dobbin 2016).…”