2019
DOI: 10.1080/10564934.2019.1691015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Nation in Early Childhood Education: Multi-Sited Comparison between Pedagogies of Nation in Australia and Hungary

Abstract: This study investigates how nation is taught, learned, practiced, and performed in early childhood educational settings in Australia and Hungary. Analysis, based on comparative multi-sited ethnography, reveals nationhood as a taken for granted, unreflexively promoted framework for organising social life. The 'pedagogy of nation' operates in different ways in these two settings.In Australia, it draws on contemporary patterns of lifestyle, whereas in Hungary it rekindles past traditions within contemporary globa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We contrasted and juxtaposed the memories, paying special attention to the protagonists of the stories and to bodies, objects, and their relations, as well as to liquids, smells, emotions, and affects. Our exploration can be conceptualised as an 'analysis through discussion' (Gordon et al 2000;Lahelma et al 2014;Millei and Lappalainen 2020). Being both insiders and outsiders of cultures helped us to notice similarities and differences in the stories, especially those related to geopolitical and economic contexts.…”
Section: Exploring Menarche Through Childhood Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We contrasted and juxtaposed the memories, paying special attention to the protagonists of the stories and to bodies, objects, and their relations, as well as to liquids, smells, emotions, and affects. Our exploration can be conceptualised as an 'analysis through discussion' (Gordon et al 2000;Lahelma et al 2014;Millei and Lappalainen 2020). Being both insiders and outsiders of cultures helped us to notice similarities and differences in the stories, especially those related to geopolitical and economic contexts.…”
Section: Exploring Menarche Through Childhood Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the steady rise of globalization, national content has been preserved in school curricula and textbooks continue to deploy nationalist narratives throughout the world (Lerch, Russell, and Ramirez 2017). Yet, research on how today’s schools inculcate ideas of nationhood and national belonging into students has been confined to a few narrow areas: the study of history education and textbooks (e.g., Dierkes 2010; Jaskulowski et al 2018; Lerch, Russell, and Ramirez 2017; Tormey 2006; Schissler and Soysal 2005), and to a lesser extent, school ceremonies and similar performances of nationhood in educational settings (Lomsky-Feder 2004; 2011; Millei and Lappalainen 2020). More recently, attention has shifted to civics classes and citizenship education (Bénéï 2005; Gholami 2017; Miller-Idriss 2009), and exploring how these are now conceptualized and designed as vehicles for immigrant incorporation (Osler 2011; Siebers 2019).…”
Section: Heritage Tourism Nation-building and Public Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these stories, the humans retain their exceptionalism and exist within the national borders and nationally marked natural and architectural symbolic objects. Millei and Lappalainen (2023) decide to go beyond critique as deconstruction to imagine alternatives to these narratives. They develop a different notion of the child: as of the world, terrestrial, biosocial, and more-than-human to take issue with the nation as the primary vector of identity, being and belonging.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Contributions To The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%