2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2007.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning market prices in real-time supply chain management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is that prices in the TAC SCM game tend to be quite stable for long periods, especially if the start and end game conditions are excluded. 6 One of the primary reasons we use this as a baseline is that we believe it is reflective of the "default" heuristic methods used by many of the agents to make decisions (especially in the early years of the competition). In particular, it only makes use of local information about prices in the current game, and does not attempt to project changes in price levels over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason is that prices in the TAC SCM game tend to be quite stable for long periods, especially if the start and end game conditions are excluded. 6 One of the primary reasons we use this as a baseline is that we believe it is reflective of the "default" heuristic methods used by many of the agents to make decisions (especially in the early years of the competition). In particular, it only makes use of local information about prices in the current game, and does not attempt to project changes in price levels over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these approaches use only price information from the current game instance to predict prices, and do not attempt to predict changes in prices from the current levels [3,4,6,14]. Pardoe and Stone [20] explored a variety of machine learning techniques to estimating the probability of winning the current customer auctions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used by the teams include fuzzy reasoning inference mechanisms [27], additive regression with decision stumps [42], linear regression [3], linear cumulative density function (CDF) [5], reverse CDF [32], continuous knapsack problem [4], dynamic pricing [8,29], and k-nearest neighbors [13,34]. The comparison analysis of various predicting algorithms [43] demonstrates superior performance of machine learning algorithms over traditional statistical approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamic pricing model is proposed in [7], where market conditions are represented as a set of bid prices which have a certain probability of being accepted. The approximations of these prices are learned using both online and historical information and updated after each day of trading.…”
Section: Learning Applications In Simulations Of Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%