2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-018-0083-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning local, quenched disorder in plasticity and other crackling noise phenomena

Abstract: When far from equilibrium, many-body systems display behavior that strongly depends on the initial conditions. A characteristic such example is the phenomenon of plasticity of crystalline and amorphous materials that strongly depends on the material history. In plasticity modeling, the history is captured by a quenched, local and disordered flow stress distribution. While it is this disorder that causes avalanches that are commonly observed during nanoscale plastic deformation, the functional form and scaling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average curvature drastically decreases as the sample size decreases i.e., a longer continuous transition from elastic to perfect plastic, in contrast to the expected discontinuous yielding of annealed structures (dashed lines). The observed nonlinear behavior is evidently related to the yield strength size effect in small volumes: while the ensemble average of the yield strength increases as w → 0 (see Figure 4b) for either annealed or loaded microstructures, the yield strength distribution (see Figure 4b) becomes drastically wider with system-size for loaded dislocation configurations, in a qualitative agreement with nanopillar compression phenomenology [37]. By comparing Figure 4a,b, one may notice that the yield stress distribution disparity mirrors the system-size dependence of the anelastic (nonlinear) average behavior.…”
Section: The Mechanical Response Of Finite Small Volumes In Multi-slisupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The average curvature drastically decreases as the sample size decreases i.e., a longer continuous transition from elastic to perfect plastic, in contrast to the expected discontinuous yielding of annealed structures (dashed lines). The observed nonlinear behavior is evidently related to the yield strength size effect in small volumes: while the ensemble average of the yield strength increases as w → 0 (see Figure 4b) for either annealed or loaded microstructures, the yield strength distribution (see Figure 4b) becomes drastically wider with system-size for loaded dislocation configurations, in a qualitative agreement with nanopillar compression phenomenology [37]. By comparing Figure 4a,b, one may notice that the yield stress distribution disparity mirrors the system-size dependence of the anelastic (nonlinear) average behavior.…”
Section: The Mechanical Response Of Finite Small Volumes In Multi-slisupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In this context, one might use an independent machine-learning method proposed in Ref. 21 and a stress tensor i which is connected to the reversible (elastic) strain tensor via the tensor of elastic constants, which we assume to represent an isotropic material. The internal microstructure of each element is characterized by a spectrum of stress dependent energy barriers of which we assume the lowest barrier, �E min,i ( i ) to control activation of irreversible deformation.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, one might use an independent machine-learning method proposed in Ref. 21 to infer local threshold distributions for matching simulations from non universal features of the experimental avalanche statistics.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work, dislocation classification was performed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) 18 and continuous k-nearest neighbors clustering algorithms 19 . Analogous classifications of dislocation structures have since been extended in disordered dislocation environments 20 and three dimensional DDD samples 21 , as well as continuous plasticity models 22 using a variety of data science approaches. However, the problems in existing works are either in simpler models of dislocation dynamics 20 or with less challenging limits of the model (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%