2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2220673/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Inverse Kinematics using Neural Computational Primitives on Neuromorphic Hardware

Abstract: Current low latency neuromorphic processing systems, and future ones based on ultra-low power mixed-signal circuits in advanced technology nodes and memristive nano-scale devices, hold great potential for developing autonomous artificial agents. However, the variable nature and low precision of the underlying hardware substrate pose severe challenges for robust and reliable performance. To address these challenges, we adopt hardware-friendly processing strategies based on brain-inspired computational primitive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this work supports ongoing efforts to develop real-time and robust neuromorphic solutions for robot control exhibiting desired behaviors [19]. The proposed methods could be combined with emerging solutions for the inverse-kinematics calculation of high-dimensional robotic arms [67,76] to provide end-to-end neuromorphic control. Unlike other methods, here we aimed to derive computational principles from the knowledge of how the brain attains optimal motor behavior and introduce them to the design of neuromorphic robotic controllers, adding to the growing pool of non-cognitive neuromorphic applications [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Overall, this work supports ongoing efforts to develop real-time and robust neuromorphic solutions for robot control exhibiting desired behaviors [19]. The proposed methods could be combined with emerging solutions for the inverse-kinematics calculation of high-dimensional robotic arms [67,76] to provide end-to-end neuromorphic control. Unlike other methods, here we aimed to derive computational principles from the knowledge of how the brain attains optimal motor behavior and introduce them to the design of neuromorphic robotic controllers, adding to the growing pool of non-cognitive neuromorphic applications [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The DYNAP-SE hardware platform contains the desired network implementation. In addition, a computer-inthe-loop setup is necessary to implement the triplet STDP learning algorithm in DYNAP-SE [52]. DYNAP-SE returns the information from the network in real time to the PC and, based on this information, it calculates the changes of weights in those synapses with the triplet STDP mechanism.…”
Section: Experimentation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To learn a mapping between the output neurons of the TDE units and the classification neurons representing the two-speed classes, a triplet STDP learning rule is applied. In this project, the implementation presented in [29] is used. During the learning process, an array of spike times is randomly selected from a collected data set.…”
Section: A Vision Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al demonstrate how a PID controller can be implemented with relational networks on the DynapSE-1 processor to control a robotic arm. [25]. One essential component of their proposed controller is a relational network which links two 1D input populations to a 1D output population via a 2D hidden layer of neurons.…”
Section: Motor Modulementioning
confidence: 99%