2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2012.6235544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning invariant features of tumor signatures

Abstract: We present a novel method for automated learning of features from unlabeled image patches for classification of tumor architecture. In contrast to manually designed feature detectors (e.g., Gabor basis function), the proposed method utilizes independent subspace analysis to reconstruct a natural representation. Learning is described as a two-layer network with non-linear responses, where the second layer represents subspace structures. The technique is applied to tissue sections for characterizing necrosis, ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expert designed features include morphometric features [14], fractal features [15], texture features [16] and object-like features [17]. However, study [18] has pointed out that features learned by a two-layer network with non-linear responses using unlabeled image patches are superior to expert designed representations when it comes to histopathology images. Nayak [19] introduces sparse features learning using the restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) to describe histopathology features in GBM and clear cell kidney carcinoma (KIRC).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert designed features include morphometric features [14], fractal features [15], texture features [16] and object-like features [17]. However, study [18] has pointed out that features learned by a two-layer network with non-linear responses using unlabeled image patches are superior to expert designed representations when it comes to histopathology images. Nayak [19] introduces sparse features learning using the restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) to describe histopathology features in GBM and clear cell kidney carcinoma (KIRC).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main methods consists of manually feature design, supervised feature learning, and unsupervised feature learning. Boucheron [18] and Chang [19] focus on manual feature design while Le [20] focuses on unsupervised feature learning. Boucheron et al [18] exploited segmentation results of cell nuclei as features to improve the classification accuracy in histopathology images of breast cancer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang et al [19] presented nuclear level morphometric features at various locations and scales within the spatial pyramid matching to classify tumor histopathology images. Le et al [20] proposed a two-layer network with nonlinear responses to automatically learn features in histopathology tumor images. In our work, we compared the three main methods on a colon histopathology dataset.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first layer of a CNN learns filters similar in concept to the features that are learned by RISA [5], which has been used in the analysis of tumor signatures and outperforms the best known expert-designed feature detector for that task [6].…”
Section: A Neural Network For Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%