2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.03847
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Inconsistent Preferences with Gaussian Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digraph III Digraph IV In ranking applications, the data is often assumed to be totally rankable, i.e., observations are some noisy evaluations of an objective function that reflects the true unique ranking. Recently, however, some in the ranking community have challenged this assumption; specifically, in [1,4] quantitative metrics are proposed for measuring the rankability of data, and in [8] general preference modeling methods are developed without assuming total rankability. Since the linear ordering problem results in a ranking that is optimal with respect to the objective function in (1a), it is natural to consider what properties of the LOP can be used to analyze the rankability of the underlying data.…”
Section: Lomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Digraph III Digraph IV In ranking applications, the data is often assumed to be totally rankable, i.e., observations are some noisy evaluations of an objective function that reflects the true unique ranking. Recently, however, some in the ranking community have challenged this assumption; specifically, in [1,4] quantitative metrics are proposed for measuring the rankability of data, and in [8] general preference modeling methods are developed without assuming total rankability. Since the linear ordering problem results in a ranking that is optimal with respect to the objective function in (1a), it is natural to consider what properties of the LOP can be used to analyze the rankability of the underlying data.…”
Section: Lomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many ranking applications, the data is often assumed to be totally rankable, i.e., observations are some noisy evaluations of an objective function that reflects the true unique ranking [8]. In [1], the authors questioned this assumption by proposing the concept of rankability, which refers to a dataset's inherent ability to be meaningfully ranked.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation