2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning how actions function: The role of outcomes in infants’ representation of events

Abstract: Action is a fundamental component of object representations. However, little is known about how infants represent actions performed on objects. Across four experiments, we tested the hypothesis that at 10 months of age (N = 80) infants represent the general ability of actions to produce outcomes (sounds). Experiments 1A and 1B showed that infants encode actions and associate actions and object appearances in events in which actions produced no sound outcomes. Experiment 2 showed that infants associate the pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that 11-month-olds familiarized with a single exemplar of a category failed to learn the animal-sound pairing or generalize the sound property is consistent with a growing body of research, demonstrating that infants younger than 12 months of age have difficulty learning multiple relations among features in dynamic events (Baumgartner & Oakes, 2011Perone & Oakes, 2006;Perone, Madole, Ross-Sheehy, Carey, & Oakes, 2008;Perone, Madole, & Oakes, 2011). For example, when infants are asked to learn the relation between the appearance, action, and outcome of an action, research has revealed a developmental trend in infants' ability to form associations among these features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our finding that 11-month-olds familiarized with a single exemplar of a category failed to learn the animal-sound pairing or generalize the sound property is consistent with a growing body of research, demonstrating that infants younger than 12 months of age have difficulty learning multiple relations among features in dynamic events (Baumgartner & Oakes, 2011Perone & Oakes, 2006;Perone, Madole, Ross-Sheehy, Carey, & Oakes, 2008;Perone, Madole, & Oakes, 2011). For example, when infants are asked to learn the relation between the appearance, action, and outcome of an action, research has revealed a developmental trend in infants' ability to form associations among these features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, within the first year there is evidence that infants use information within continuous actions to segment those actions into meaningful units (Baldwin, Baird, Saylor, & Clark, 2001). For example, infants parse continuous action into subcomponents (Hespos, Saylor, & Grossman, 2009), recognize disruptions of biological motion (Marshall & Shipley, 2009), encode the outcomes of specific actions (Perone, Madole, & Oakes, 2011), and discriminate complete from incomplete goal-directed activity (Reid, Csibra, Belsky, & Johnson, 2007). In large part, what we know about infant action processing is based on responses to discrete, familiar coarse-grained actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serving humans will require a capability to detect many different objects and to learn about them. Ideally, robots should be able to learn about objects without constant or dedicated supervision, but rather like children do, during interaction with adults and by manipulating objects [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%