2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning heterogeneous information network embeddings via relational triplet network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In heterogeneous network platform, there are different types of links between nodes, which represent different kinds of relations and contain rich semantic information. How to calculate the similarity between nodes is an important problem in the process of extracting the relation information of heterogeneous networks [28][29][30]. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence machine learning in recent years, many new technologies have emerged.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In heterogeneous network platform, there are different types of links between nodes, which represent different kinds of relations and contain rich semantic information. How to calculate the similarity between nodes is an important problem in the process of extracting the relation information of heterogeneous networks [28][29][30]. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence machine learning in recent years, many new technologies have emerged.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, one triplet network focused on negative attribute features and the other triplet network paid attention on negative visual features to ensure that the data information is fully utilized. Gao et al [33] proposed a new heterogeneous information network embedding algorithm. In the data sampling phase, a metaschema-based random walk was performed to extract semihard quadruplets based on the node type and its degree.…”
Section: Triple Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding methods, which are effective for extracting features from graph structured data, have broadly attracted significant attention in the literature and different embedding methods such as DeepWalk [23], Line [25], node2vec [26], graph-GAN [27], NetMF [29], ATP [24], BoostNE [30], DWNS [22], and NERD [28] have been proposed for homogeneous graphs. In addition, some embedding methods have been proposed that target the heterogeneous graphs such as HeGAN [31], RTN [32], and HAN [33]. Some methods such as SIDE [34], CSNE [35], and nSNE [36] perform feature representation learning in signed graphs where there are two types of links (i.e., positive and negative) (In this paper, we focus only on the unsigned homogeneous graphs and the related embedding methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%