Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2872427.2883069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Global Term Weights for Content-based Recommender Systems

Abstract: Recommender systems typically leverage two types of signals to effectively recommend items to users: user activities and content matching between user and item profiles, and recommendation models in literature are usually categorized into collaborative filtering models, content-based models and hybrid models. In practice, when rich profiles about users and items are available, and user activities are sparse (cold-start), effective content matching signals become much more important in the relevance of the reco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommender systems reflect the user’s interest and make proper personalized recommendation through several methods. Most current systems have adopted recently developed algorithms that use machine-learning [ 14 16 ], naive Bayes [ 16 , 17 ], social-trust-based [ 18 21 ], constraint-based [ 22 ], case-based [ 23 , 24 ], and matrix factorization [ 25 , 26 ] approaches. Recommender systems are also found in clinical settings, mainly to assist health professionals, though some systems assist family members, patients, or caregivers [ 27 – 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommender systems reflect the user’s interest and make proper personalized recommendation through several methods. Most current systems have adopted recently developed algorithms that use machine-learning [ 14 16 ], naive Bayes [ 16 , 17 ], social-trust-based [ 18 21 ], constraint-based [ 22 ], case-based [ 23 , 24 ], and matrix factorization [ 25 , 26 ] approaches. Recommender systems are also found in clinical settings, mainly to assist health professionals, though some systems assist family members, patients, or caregivers [ 27 – 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Collaborative recommendation systems: These approaches recommend the items based on the similarity of tastes and preferences between users using a utility matrix [4,5]. • Content-based recommendation systems: These approaches recommend the items based on the description of the item and a profile of the user's preference and history [6][7][8][9][10]. • Hybrid recommendation systems: These approaches combine collaborative and content-based methods to recommend some items to the users [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gu et al [7] proposed a method to measure the similarity between two pieces of text using cosine similarity of the two bags of words, where each word is weighted by its tf-idf, and they applied this method on LinkedIn job data. A similar method has been proposed by Philip et al [8] but for digital libraries. Also, Lak et al [9] proposed an article recommendation system that uses tf-idf and word2vec for converting each article to a feature-vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard way to measure similarity between two profiles is computing the cosine similarity of the two bags of words, and each word is weighted by term frequency tf (within the document) × inverted document frequency idf (of the term within the corpus). While the local term frequency could be computed offline, it has been suggested [9] that the global term weights idf requires further optimization to achieve better precision. Thus, we optimize the global term weights with the guidance of the similarity from PathSim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%