2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10677-4_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Gaussian Process Models from Uncertain Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for the uncertainties of the labels, we follow Dallaire et al (2009). Instead of using only point estimates, we assume that individual star labels are normally distributed around the mean valuesξ and have their own covariance matrices Σ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for the uncertainties of the labels, we follow Dallaire et al (2009). Instead of using only point estimates, we assume that individual star labels are normally distributed around the mean valuesξ and have their own covariance matrices Σ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, the test points are assumed to be a set of Gaussian distributions, and hence, the integral is analytically tractable. It should be noted that the true scheduling variables are not observable; however, we have access to their distribution N (P * , Σ p ), where P * is the observed test point [13]. Therefore, the noise-free scheduling variables are assumed to be Gaussian distributedP * ∼ N (P * , Σ p ), whereP * = p * i , i = 1, .…”
Section: Learning With Uncertain Scheduling Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge in directly applying the GP regression as described above is that the Larson-Miller parameter depends on C which we now wish to represent as an additional random variable. Fortunately, there is a analytic solution, described as a kernel function, for the statistics of Gaussian process with a radial basis (squared exponential) kernel with uncertain inputs, provided the inputs are normally distributed [16,17]. Applying this solution to Eq.…”
Section: Gaussian Process Model For Creep Rupturementioning
confidence: 99%