Learning from the Past: Pandemics and the Governance Treadmill

Abstract

Global human health threats, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, necessitate coordinated responses at multiple levels. Public health professionals and other experts broadly agree about actions needed to address such threats, but implementation of this advice is stymied by systemic factors such as prejudice, resource deficits, and high inequality. In these cases, crises like epidemics may be viewed as opportunities to spark structural changes that will improve future prevention efforts. However, crises can also weaken governance and reinforce systemic failures. In this paper, we use the concept of the governance treadmill to demonstrate cross-level dynamics that help or hinder the alignment of capacities toward prevention during public health crises. We find that variation in capacities and responses across local, national, and international levels contributes to the complex evolution of global and local health governance. Where capacities are misaligned, effective local prevention of global pandemic impacts tends to be elusive in the short term, and multiple cycles of crisis and response may be required before capacities align toward healthy governance. We demonstrate that this transition requires broader societal adaptation, particularly towards social justice and participatory democracy.

Implementing just climate adaptation policy: An analysis of recognition, framing, and advocacy coalitions in Boston, U.S.A.

“…Our analysis revealed three interrelated procedural features that reinforced reliance on technical and policy experts of the adaptation coalition to the detriment of socially vulnerable groups in the just adaptation coalition (Webster et al, 2022). First, we found CRB decisions tended to reinforce dominant coalition dynamics that favored elite interests and exacerbated power inequalities.…”

The Collaborative Policy Modeling Paradox: Perceptions of water quality modeling in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

“…Navigating this paradox requires addressing those political issues head-on, even when they appear to be intractable. This is why it is important to consider not only design principles but also precursors to governance, or the dynamic processes that a system must go through to ensure that participants are willing and able to design and implement effective governanceor, more to the point for this paper, constructively engage in participatory modeling (Webster et al, 2022).…”

Earth Systems to Anthropocene Systems: An Evolutionary, System-of-Systems, Convergence Paradigm for Interdependent Societal Challenges

“…43,83 With these malleable human predispositions, trust is a crucial element of any successful sociocultural group or society. 84 If we are all subject to the rule of law regardless of social status or identity, and if we collectively trust that group leaders or the governance system 85 will represent our common interests, then we do not need to directly trust other sociocultural groups. If trust fails, however, then we tend to revert back to our closer sociocultural groups, including extended kinship groups, friends, and ethnic and religious communities, where trust comes more naturally.…”