Editors lean heavily on reviewers to advise them on topics where their own background is lacking. Some reviewers are invited to give feedback on a manuscript because of their statistical acumen, knowledge of the research methodology, their clinical experience in schools, or their proficiency with students who have a specific health condition. However, others are invited because they are content experts or their program of research is in the same area as the manuscript's authors. As a reviewer, the most valuable insight a reviewer can share with an editor is whether or not a research study or literature review sheds new light on a topic. Some of the manuscripts received by The Journal of School Nursing are studies that describe relationships between variables that are already accepted in the scientific community. These studies are frequently easy and inexpensive to administer via an online survey. The investigators sought and received Institutional Review Board approval that their research did not violate human subjects' protections. The researchers conducting these inquiries often use reliable and validated measurement tools. The authors demonstrate careful statistical analysis and interpretation of their findings. On the standard peer-reviewer checklist, the study scores well on the mechanics of scholarly inquiry and writing. However, the study merely reinforces what has already been widely published in the literature, sometimes dating back three or more decades.Researchers should make this job easy for the editor and reviewer. The literature review should detail the established knowledge in the field on this topic. The authors should explain clearly how this research study expands on what is already known. Does it fill a gap that will help nurses or other researchers? Does the study examine a phenomenon in a new population, a new setting, using different levels of health providers?While research in school nursing has grown substantially over the last 20 years, there are still broad gaps in what we do not know about the students we serve, the interventions that are the most effective, and the structures and environmental factors that promote or inhibit quality school nursing care (Best & McCabe, 2023;Tanner & Stanislo, 2022). The Journal of School Nursing is dedicated to publishing the science needed to educate and support nurses, create school nursing clinical practice guidelines, and advise state and federal policymakers on the safest and most costeffective school health practices. We aim to publish manuscripts that tell The JOSN readers something they do not already know.