2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from the implementation of Universal Free School Meals in Scotland using Normalisation Process Theory: Lessons for policymakers to engage multiple stakeholders

Abstract: Highlights Universal free school meals (UFSM) could improve children’s outcomes. Evaluation of UFSM policies internationally is limited. UFSM policies need to engage with multiple stakeholders adequately. Policymakers must communicate the potential benefits to educational stakeholders. Adequate monitoring and evaluation could help to improve communication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of municipalities with local policy documents, only 58 % had followed these up within the previous three years (25) . Poor evaluation and monitoring is a common and persistent problem in the field of school meal policy (5,7,27) and means that good practice and/or lessons learned may be missed. Evaluations of the effects of truly universal meal policies are particularly challenging and are, unsurprisingly, rare (5) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of municipalities with local policy documents, only 58 % had followed these up within the previous three years (25) . Poor evaluation and monitoring is a common and persistent problem in the field of school meal policy (5,7,27) and means that good practice and/or lessons learned may be missed. Evaluations of the effects of truly universal meal policies are particularly challenging and are, unsurprisingly, rare (5) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advancement of win-win food scenarios faces significant barriers at several levels (Shen et al 2017;Neto and Gama Caldas 2018;Bonanno and Mendis, 2021) and different time periods (Chambers et al 2020). Having more organic products in the menu clashes with a lack of information on these products (Xie et al 2015;Melovic et al 2020) in addition to higher prices (Aschemann and Zielke, 2017;Filippini et al 2018) and the fact that some consumers prioritize health benefits over environmental benefits (Jensen et al 2011;Hjelmar., 2011).…”
Section: Political Implications: Perspective Barriers and Policies To...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Scandinavian countries offer free school meals on a universal basis, that is, every student is eligible to receive a free lunch [ 2 ]. Estonia, South Korea, the US, England and Scotland have all introduced variations of this free and universal approach but the concept is not widespread [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. In 2019, Aotearoa New Zealand’s government announced a two-year pilot programme to explore the delivery of a free and healthy school lunch programme in a ‘whole of school’ approach to all students in the 25% least advantaged schools within several regions around the country [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%