2017
DOI: 10.3233/isu-170831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from the field and its listserv: Issues that concern health literacy practitioners

Abstract: Abstract. This study assesses the content of email messages posted to the Health Literacy Discussion List (HLDL) during a two-year period. The study identifies issues of concern to list subscribers, describes the purposes the list serves for health professionals, and contributes to the health literacy literature by providing an email listserv as a research corpus. The authors conducted an inductive qualitative analysis of email posts to the HLDL from October 2013 to October 2015. Using an iterative process, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The clinical forum on the North American Society of OM, although initially underutilized, after distribution of an email list of North American and international members, showed improved membership, usage and communication. 17 There have been similar reports on the success of existing listservers by some other groups, 1820 although some others reported that although they functioned well as information boards, they did not function effectively for scientific case discussions. 21,22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…16 The clinical forum on the North American Society of OM, although initially underutilized, after distribution of an email list of North American and international members, showed improved membership, usage and communication. 17 There have been similar reports on the success of existing listservers by some other groups, 1820 although some others reported that although they functioned well as information boards, they did not function effectively for scientific case discussions. 21,22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This discussion thread model illustrated collective knowledge creation, as various VC members worked together to solve a knowledge need or local problem presented by the first poster. These conversations, discussions and potential difference of opinion that occur online are a key attribute of a VCoP (Barnett et al, ; Chang et al, ), enabling development of professional knowledge for individual members and the collective practice knowledge of the community, leading to potential improvements in practice and innovation (Kurtz‐Rossi et al, ; Trinacty et al, ; Wenger, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEDLIB, a community for medical librarians established in 1991, continues to use a listserv platform and was rated higher than other social media by members (Muñoz‐Cañavate, Fernández‐Falero, & Hurtado‐Guapo, ). The ongoing relevance of the platform is also seen in the continuing use of the RedIRIS communities by Spanish HCPs (Muñoz‐Cañavate, Fernández‐Falero, & Hurtado‐Guapo, ), the health literacy discussion list (HLDL; Kurtz‐Rossi et al, ) and the “Implementation and Optimization Forum” created in 2012 by American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although user needs drive individuals to experiment with social media, the perceived innovation characteristics of that media will influence final adoption decisions [77,81]. The ongoing relevance and viability of listservs can be seen its continued use by MEDLIB (a VC established in 1991) [82], the REDIRIS communities by Spanish HCPs and the health literacy discussion list [83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%