Learning from one another: evaluating the impact of horizontal knowledge exchange for environmental management and governance

Abstract

. 2016. Learning from one another: evaluating the impact of horizontal knowledge exchange for environmental management and governance. Ecology and Society 21 (2) ABSTRACT. There is increasing advocacy for inclusive community-based approaches to environmental management, and growing evidence that involving communities improves the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Most community-based approaches rely on partnerships and knowledge exchange between communities, civil society organizations, and professionals such as practitioners and/or scientists. However, few models have actively integrated more horizontal knowledge exchange from community to community. We reflect on the transferability of community owned solutions between indigenous communities by exploring challenges and achievements of community peer-to-peer knowledge exchange as a way of empowering communities to face up to local environmental and social challenges. Using participatory visual methods, indigenous communities of the North Rupununi (Guyana) identified and documented their community owned solutions through films and photostories. Indigenous researchers from this community then shared their solutions with six other communities that faced similar challenges within Guyana, Suriname, Venezuela, Colombia, French Guiana, and Brazil. They were supported by in-country civil society organizations and academics. We analyzed the impact of the knowledge exchange through interviews, field reports, and observations. Our results show that indigenous community members were significantly more receptive to solutions emerging from, and communicated by, other indigenous peoples, and that this approach was a significant motivating force for galvanizing communities to make changes in their community. We identified a range of enabling factors, such as building capacity for a shared conceptual and technical understanding, that strengthens the exchange between communities and contributes to a lasting impact. With national and international policy-makers mobilizing significant financial resources for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation, we argue that the promotion of community owned solutions through community peer-to-peer exchange may deliver more long-lasting, socially and ecologically integrated, and investment-effective strategies compared to top-down, expert led, and/or foreign-led initiatives.

Science Embedded in Local Forest Landscape Management Improves Benefit Flows to Society

“…Recently Tschirhart et al (2016) confirmed that peer to peer learning is effective and that effort should be put into identifying, and then strengthening, community owned solutions through peer-to-peer knowledge exchange. Policy, Social, and Actor Network Analysis (Jackson, 2010;Brockhaus et al, 2014;Gallemore et al, 2015) coupled with Actor Network Theory (Valverde, 2007) can provide insight on where scientists can situate themselves to co-generate the knowledge that will influence narratives and behaviors.…”

Reconciling theory and practice on the participation of the downtrodden in poverty intervention policies and programs

“…Patel and Mitlin (2002) declared that participation process is a transformational apparatus for social change, better decision and efficient services to the society. Participation in decision making provides avenues for cross-fertilization of idea (Tschirhart et al, 2016) as it enable the citizen acquires skills to challenge or persuade the government where necessary; and conversely, government persuades its citizens, builds trust and calm anxiety or hostility to strike a balance vis-à-vis give room for harmonious relationship with the citizens towards societal development .…”

Creating legal rights for rivers: lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India

“…The framework intends to be inclusive rather than exclusive, creating a type of nested community governance within the broader legal framework (Tschirhart et al 2016, Talbot-Jones 2017. Implementation of the Te Awa Tupua framework is supported through a series of payments to the river by the Crown, including a NZ$30 million contestable fund, Te Korotete o Te Awa Tupua, which can be used for the purposes of giving the rights of the river and its catchment force and effect.…”