2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from multiple representations: An examination of fixation patterns in a science simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we conclude that visual cues indeed made students' meaning for vector fields deeper. The results are in line with design principles of multimedia learning, that is, providing graphical representations with visual cues improves learning [30,31]. Positive correlations between response accuracy and confidence have been reported in several studies [17][18][19][20], and the data from this study support these findings in the context of instruction-based learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hence, we conclude that visual cues indeed made students' meaning for vector fields deeper. The results are in line with design principles of multimedia learning, that is, providing graphical representations with visual cues improves learning [30,31]. Positive correlations between response accuracy and confidence have been reported in several studies [17][18][19][20], and the data from this study support these findings in the context of instruction-based learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While in some studies an increased number of saccades led to better performance (e.g., Refs. [56,[59][60][61]), this could not be confirmed in other studies (e.g., Refs. [62][63][64]).…”
Section: Eye Trackingcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Equal in size and shape, these AOIs were positioned contiguously (with no space in between and no overlap) so as to capture the nine paths linking each of the ten stock‐prices to one another. To assess the total amount of time spent examining each price movement, time stamps were summed for each AOI (O'Keefe et al, 2014; van der Lans, Pieters, & Wedel, 2008; van der Lans, Wedel, & Pieters, 2011). As expected, paired‐samples t‐tests revealed that the ninth AOI (which captured the last trade‐direction) was gazed the longest (i.e., 1.45 (1.25) second in the downward (upward) condition) and significantly more than each of the previous eight AOIs which ranged from .31 to .94 second ( p s ≤ .004; Table 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%