Learning from failed policy mobilities: Contradictions, resistances and unintended outcomes in the transfer of “Business Improvement Districts” to Germany

Abstract

This paper contributes to the debates on policy mobilities by examining Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in Germany as examples of contested, failed and unfinished travelling policies. Recent debates on policy mobilities opened a fruitful discussion on how policies are transferred from one place to another and the complex processes that rework places and policies in heterogeneous ways. While we are sympathetic to this literature, there are theoretical and empirical gaps to be addressed. It is frequently stated that processes around the transfer and grounding of policies are complex, and that outcomes are far from secure. However, the empirical focus in most cases is on transfers that are more or less "successful", or at least portrayed as being successful by their advocates. In contrast to this "success bias" in research and public discourse, we argue that it is helpful to focus more closely on failures, resistances and contradictions. Judging from work on the transfer of BIDs -an almost classical example of successfully mobilized urban policies -we argue that it is helpful to reflect on unfinished policy mobilities, that is, the failure of mobilized urban policies.

Multi-stakeholder initiatives, policy learning and institutionalization: the surprising failure of open government in Norway

“…Attention to these dynamics has highlighted instances in which transfer was distorted or incomplete, emphasizing the domestic political and communicative dynamics that inhibit successful policy transfer (Park, Lee, & Wilding, 2016;Stein, Michel, Glasze, & Putz, 2015), a…”

How to make them walk the talk: governing the implementation of energy and climate policies into local practices

“…Although a number of articles have emerged lately that deal with the gap "between the plans for, and the reality of, sustainability" (Carr, 2014(Carr, :1827Jordan, 2008), few contributions have so far engaged with "transfer failures" (Künkel, 2015:90). Stein et al (2015) even speak of a "success bias" within policy mobility research and underline the necessity of focusing more explicitly on failures, resistances and contradictions in order to reveal the contingency and contested nature of hegemonic norms and guidelines (Stein et al, 2015:2). The empirical parts of our paper will discuss such contestations and oppositions, drawing on the case study of Dresden (Sect.…”

Policy mobilities as informal processes: evidence from “creative city” policy-making in Gdańsk and Stockholm

“…The temporalitythe short-term nature or even "failure" (Lovell, 2019;cf. McLean & Borén, 2015;Stein, Michel, Glasze, & Pütz, 2017)of such policy-mobilities is not often discussed in the literature. Informational infrastructures, with their focus on "best practice" and "expert knowledge", often do little to encourage discussion among policymakers of things that didn't work, and it is important to explore how these discourses circulate in less formal channels.…”