Academic Literacy Development 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62877-2_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from Feedback via Peer Review: Using Concept Maps to Explore the Development of Scholarly Writing Literacies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, results stress the developmental nature of research writing, as many post-PhD researchers still struggle to effectively manage the writing process and produce the expected outcomes, and highlight the importance of learning to write and publish beyond the doctorate (Bazerman et al, 2012; Hyland & Jiang, 2016) to career progress (Li & Flowerdew, 2020; Scaffidi & Berman, 2011), and to develop researchers’ academic literacy (Gravett, 2021) and identity (A. Burgess & Ivanič, 2010; McAlpine et al, 2016, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To conclude, results stress the developmental nature of research writing, as many post-PhD researchers still struggle to effectively manage the writing process and produce the expected outcomes, and highlight the importance of learning to write and publish beyond the doctorate (Bazerman et al, 2012; Hyland & Jiang, 2016) to career progress (Li & Flowerdew, 2020; Scaffidi & Berman, 2011), and to develop researchers’ academic literacy (Gravett, 2021) and identity (A. Burgess & Ivanič, 2010; McAlpine et al, 2016, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%