2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-65382216000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from Each Other: Respecting Cultural Differences in an International Research Agenda

Abstract: As opportunities for international research collaboration increase, it becomes increasingly important to recognise the importance of respecting cultural differences in our traditions and approaches to the research process. By discussing these differences and also establishing common ground, it is possible to strengthen research capacity and draw upon a range of methodological and philosophical expertise. Such a process should also enable educational researchers to reconsider their relationships with other prof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While much has been written about the importance of researching disability (Brown and Boardman, 2011;Vaccaro, Kimball, Wells and Ostiguy, 2014), opportunities for practitioners to engage in research remain limited (Hardwick and Worsley, 2011;Rose, 2016). In India, disability and rehabilitation research has been dominated by large-scale survey approaches that generate large quantitative data sets that are useful in providing a broad perspective but lack the depth to be of value to clinicians and practitioners (Singal, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much has been written about the importance of researching disability (Brown and Boardman, 2011;Vaccaro, Kimball, Wells and Ostiguy, 2014), opportunities for practitioners to engage in research remain limited (Hardwick and Worsley, 2011;Rose, 2016). In India, disability and rehabilitation research has been dominated by large-scale survey approaches that generate large quantitative data sets that are useful in providing a broad perspective but lack the depth to be of value to clinicians and practitioners (Singal, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%