2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from blind tests: Determining the function of experimental grinding stones through use-wear and residue analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on the tool surfaces was only described qualitatively (localization and distribution manner) with the naked eye. Starch have been extracted and analyzed following criteria known and widely accepted by modern and ancient starch analysts (Atchison and Fullagar 1998; Barton and Torrence 2015;Field et al 2009;Fullagar et al 2008;Haslam 2006;Henry et al 2009;Loy et al 1992;Mercader et al 2018; Torrence and Barton 2016; Yang and Perry 2013). We stress that the origin of the starch granules was known to us, and the scope of this work is to assess where larger masses of starch granules gather on the stone surface and assess where they appear more damaged.…”
Section: Starch Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…on the tool surfaces was only described qualitatively (localization and distribution manner) with the naked eye. Starch have been extracted and analyzed following criteria known and widely accepted by modern and ancient starch analysts (Atchison and Fullagar 1998; Barton and Torrence 2015;Field et al 2009;Fullagar et al 2008;Haslam 2006;Henry et al 2009;Loy et al 1992;Mercader et al 2018; Torrence and Barton 2016; Yang and Perry 2013). We stress that the origin of the starch granules was known to us, and the scope of this work is to assess where larger masses of starch granules gather on the stone surface and assess where they appear more damaged.…”
Section: Starch Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software was used to investigate modification in the surface topography through the creation of digital surface models (DSMs) (Benito-Calvo et al 2015). As demonstrated by Benito-Calvo et al (2015, 2017, slope and surface roughness analysis provides useful insights concerning the pattern of modification of stone tool surfaces. For the purpose of our study, these were generated using the GDALdem (http://www.gdal.…”
Section: Spatial Analysis Of the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor leading to the choice of PSR staining is its potential to mark collagenous material in ancient residual matter characterized by altered morphological features due to intense processing (Stephenson 2015). Moreover, in our own experience, PSR has a lower chance of false positive than other biochemical staining such as Orange G, which is also used for analysing archaeological residues (Hayes et al 2017).…”
Section: Residues Spatial Distribution Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A large variety of qualitative and quantitative techniques, including use wear analysis, mechanical tests, 3D modelling, surface morphometrics, spatial and residue analyses and experimental frameworks have been proposed (Arroyo and de la Torre 2020;Benito-Calvo et al 2015Caricola et al 2018;Caruana et al 2014;Delgado-Raack et al 2009;Hayes et al 2017;Hayes and Rots 2019;Procopiou et al 2002;Zupancich et al 2019). However, scholars have debated the lack of a shared analytical protocol for functional analysis (Cnuts and Rots 2018;Hayes et al 2017;Marreiros et al 2020;Zupancich et al 2019). In particular, arguments have been raised concerning the application of qualitative and quantitative approaches, the protocols for extracting ancient residues and the risk of modern contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blind testing is a highly important method in archaeology, especially when dealing with techniques which might be affected by human biases and subjectivity, allowing the identification of weaknesses within the examined technique (Evans, ). Rots, Pirnay, Pirson, and Baudoux () define blind tests as “an objective means to evaluate the accuracy of information retrieved by a specific method.” Indeed, blind tests are commonly used in microwear and macrowear studies (Bamforth, ; Bamforth, Burns, & Woodman, ; Newcomer, Grace, & Unger‐Hamilton, ; Rots et al, ), residue analysis (Hayes, Cnuts, Lepers, & Rots, ; Lombard & Wadley, ; Rots, Hayes, Cnuts, Lepers, & Fullagar, ; Wadley & Lombard, ; Wadley, Lombard, & Williamson, ), archaeozoological studies (Blumenschine, Marean, & Capaldo, ; Giovas, Lambrides, Fitzpatrick, & Kataoka, ; Gobalet, ; Lloveras, Moreno‐García, Nadal, & Thomas, ; Morin, Ready, Boileau, Beauval, & Coumont, ), micromorphology (Shahack‐Gross, ), and radiocarbon dating (Kim et al, ; Olsen et al, ). However, so far, no such tests have been applied to macroscopic raw material sorting (but see Ferguson & Warren, ; Price, Carr, & Bradbury, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%