1975
DOI: 10.3102/00028312012003265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Environment in Rural and Urban Classrooms

Abstract: The present study was an attempt to examine the learning environment and the intellectual variables of grades 8 and 11 classes from rural and urban settings representing mathematics, science, social studies, and English courses. Ninety-six classrooms provided the data. Significant multivariate main effects were obtained on locale (rural and urban) and grade (8 and 11). Significant univariate main effects and interactions are discussed in relation to the previous research and theory. Specific educational implic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of Year 12 and Year 9 religion classes revealed results which are consistent with previous research on this issue in a range of subject areas, schools types and countries (Randhawa and Michayluk 1975). Welch (1979) showed that, compared with junior high school students, senior students perceived greater Satisfaction, Order and Organisation and Democracy, but lower Formality, Friction and Favouritism in their classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The comparison of Year 12 and Year 9 religion classes revealed results which are consistent with previous research on this issue in a range of subject areas, schools types and countries (Randhawa and Michayluk 1975). Welch (1979) showed that, compared with junior high school students, senior students perceived greater Satisfaction, Order and Organisation and Democracy, but lower Formality, Friction and Favouritism in their classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For reviews on contextual characteristics, see Docker, Fraser, and Fisher (1989) and Hearn and Moos (1978); for organizational characteristics, see Anderson and Walberg (1972) and Randhawa & Michayluk (1975); for aggregate student characteristics and other factors, see Barclay and Demers (1981) and Fraser (1981).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these aspects of the group are properly developed the interpersonal feelings will be warm, supportive, and respectful, • resulting in greater motivation, increased self-esteem and high academic achievement. The notion of classroom climate has been with us for some time, (Anderson, 1939;Withall, 1952;Flanders, 1965), and recent research by Walberg (1969), Trickett and Moss (1973), Randhawa and Michayluk (1975), and Solomon and Kendall (1976), among others, has demonstrated that the environment of the classroom can have a significant impact on learning outcomes. Nielsen and Kirk (1974) have summarized instrumentation available to measure classroom environments and conclude that while most of the research is correlational, it is a promising start to investigate the relationship between learning environments and learning outcomes.…”
Section: Group Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 95%