Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1037/tmb0000058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning engineering: A view on where the field is at, where it’s going, and the research needed.

Abstract: Although the idea of learning engineering dates back to the 1960s, there has been an explosion of interest in the area in the last decade. This interest has been driven by an expansion in the computational methods available both for scaled data analysis and for much faster experimentation and iteration on student learning experiences. This article describes the findings of a virtual convening brought together to discuss the potential of learning engineering and the key opportunities available for learning engi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As digital tools for education research emerge, a known risk is that they will marginalize the teacher and neglect important details of the educational implementation, instead focusing myopically on the inner workings of the tool itself. Proponents of research within digital learning platforms advocate for greater involvement of teachers in the research process (Baker et al, 2022;McCarthy, et al, 2022), as others have advocated more broadly (Joyce & Cartwright, 2019). This is also our goal with Terracotta.…”
Section: Terracotta Enables Collaboration Between Teachers and Resear...mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As digital tools for education research emerge, a known risk is that they will marginalize the teacher and neglect important details of the educational implementation, instead focusing myopically on the inner workings of the tool itself. Proponents of research within digital learning platforms advocate for greater involvement of teachers in the research process (Baker et al, 2022;McCarthy, et al, 2022), as others have advocated more broadly (Joyce & Cartwright, 2019). This is also our goal with Terracotta.…”
Section: Terracotta Enables Collaboration Between Teachers and Resear...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fortunately, things are starting to change. Enabled by the digital transformation of education, research tools for experimentally manipulating features of the student learning environment have begun to emerge (Baker et al, 2022;McCarthy, et al, 2022). As student learning activities and student data are increasingly online, the technical infrastructure for supporting education can be leveraged for research purposes -digital learning platforms can support student learning, and also can be equipped with tools to support experimental research on education.…”
Section: Terracotta: a Tool For Conducting Experimental Research On S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a feat seems practically impossible, as most classrooms have dozens or hundreds of students with different prior knowledge, interests, and affective states when the instruction is being delivered (Aleven et al, 2016). This problem is one of visibility and scale (Baker et al, 2022). It is difficult for an educator delivering the lecture to understand the learning gains obtained by an individual student through passive observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary learning theories coupled with digital technologies provide a scalable way to achieve visibility into individual students' learning gaps and gains (Koedinger et al, 2012;Ritter et al, 2019;Baker et al, 2022). Adaptive e-learning tools, such as intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs), interleave instruction with assessments to ensure a student achieves mastery of a unit (i.e., the expected learning gains) before moving on to the next one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%