2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning edit cost estimation models for graph edit distance

Abstract: One of the most popular distance measures between a pair of graphs is the Graph Edit Distance. This approach consists of finding a set of edit operations that completely transforms a graph into another. Edit costs are introduced in order to penalize the distortion that each edit operation introduces. Then, one basic requirement when we design a Graph Edit Distance algorithm, is to define the appropriate edit cost functions. On the other hand, Machine Learning algorithms has been applied in many contexts showin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 19, the authors show that, given a fixed dataset in which some graph correspondences are known, learning costs provide better results than using some fixed edit costs.…”
Section: Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 19, the authors show that, given a fixed dataset in which some graph correspondences are known, learning costs provide better results than using some fixed edit costs.…”
Section: Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another set of methods that address the problem of learning edit costs for GED is proposed in [13,14]. These methods propose to optimize edit costs to maximize a ground truth mapping between nodes of graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is embedded into a vector because we want to use a common supervised learning algorithm, such as neural network or a support vector machine. Several embedding methods have been presented in the literature, for instance, there is one in [57] or two more recent proposals in [58,59]. In our case, we present a simple one defined by the attribute nodes (semantic information) and the number of edges adjacent to the node (structural information) as we show in Figure 3.…”
Section: Learning the Cost Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, when we apply some of the proposed strategies, our method reaches the best results. Even when the performance is similar, as in [59], our model has the crucial advantage of using an online learning paradigm. This means that, as described above, it has the capacity to learn in each interaction, significantly minimizing the number of node-to-node impositions necessary to obtain the best results.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%