Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical And Computational Semantics 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s18-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning distributed event representations with a multi-task approach

Abstract: Human world knowledge contains information about prototypical events and their participants and locations. In this paper, we train the first models using multi-task learning that can both predict missing event participants and also perform semantic role classification based on semantic plausibility. Our best-performing model is an improvement over the previous state-of-the-art on thematic fit modelling tasks. The event embeddings learned by the model can additionally be used effectively in an event similarity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several models have tried to tackle the "dynamic" version of the thematic fit task, either based on classical distributional spaces (Chersoni et al, 2016(Chersoni et al, , 2019 or on more sophisticated neural network architectures (Tilk et al, 2016;Hong et al, 2018). On the evaluation side, those works made use of the experimental materials of the study by Lenci (2011), which are, however, limited to agentverb-patient triples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models have tried to tackle the "dynamic" version of the thematic fit task, either based on classical distributional spaces (Chersoni et al, 2016(Chersoni et al, , 2019 or on more sophisticated neural network architectures (Tilk et al, 2016;Hong et al, 2018). On the evaluation side, those works made use of the experimental materials of the study by Lenci (2011), which are, however, limited to agentverb-patient triples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thematic fit is a psycholinguistic notion similar to selectional preferences, the main difference being that the latter involve the satisfaction of constraints on discrete semantic features of the arguments, while thematic fit is a continuous value expressing the degree of compatibility between an argument and a semantic role (McRae et al 1998). Distributional models for thematic fit estimation have been proposed by several authors (Erk 2007; Baroni and Lenci 2010; Erk et al 2010; Lenci 2011; Sayeed et al 2015; Greenberg et al 2015; Santus et al 2017; Tilk et al 2016; Hong et al 2018). While thematic fit data sets typically include human-elicited typicality scores for argument–filler pairs taken in isolation, DTFit includes tuples of arguments of different length, so that the typicality value of an argument depends on its interaction with the other arguments in the tuple.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… k It should also be noticed that our LSTM baseline has been trained on simple syntactic dependencies, while state-of-the-art neural models rely simultaneously on dependencies and semantic role labels (Tilk et al 2016; Hong et al 2018). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach captures a rich variety of explicit semantic connections among complex events. (Hong et al, 2018) learns distributed event representations using supervised multi-task learning, while our framework is based on unsupervised learning. Network Embedding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%