2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2012.6467559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning discriminative dictionaries with partially labeled data

Abstract: While recent techniques for discriminative dictionary learning have demonstrated tremendous success in image analysis applications, their performance is often limited by the amount of labeled data available for training. Even though labeling images is difficult, it is relatively easy to collect unlabeled images either by querying the web or from public datasets. In this paper, we propose a discriminative dictionary learning technique which utilizes both labeled and unlabeled data for learning dictionaries. Ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24], Shrivastava et al [19] learnt a class-specific dictionary by using Fisher discriminant analysis on the coding vectors of the labeled data. However, its model is complex: the training data is represented by a combination of all class-specific dictionaries, and the coding coefficients are regularized by both intra-class and inter-class constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[24], Shrivastava et al [19] learnt a class-specific dictionary by using Fisher discriminant analysis on the coding vectors of the labeled data. However, its model is complex: the training data is represented by a combination of all class-specific dictionaries, and the coding coefficients are regularized by both intra-class and inter-class constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, as in prevailing semi-supervised dictionary methods [11,18,19,[21][22][23]36], we assume that the unlabeled training data belongs to some class of the training set. In our proposed model, the dictionary to be…”
Section: Ssd-lp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations