“…While there is a wide consensus regarding the right of students with disabilities to receive the same testing opportunities as their peers (Fuchs et al, 2005), the impact of testing accommodations on students' self-beliefs and achievements and on classroom climate requires further examination (Lovett, 2014;Lovett & Leja, 2013). Indeed, it is generally accepted that testing accommodations have a positive effect on performance as they improve motivation especially for students with disabilities (E. Feldman et al, 2011), yet research on their impact for students with ADHD and with learning disability was not consistent (Jansen et al, 2019;Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). These results focus attention on the implicit theories that the students hold on the effectiveness, fairness, and appropriateness of such accommodations, which may play an important role in predicting their outcomes (Einav et al, 2018).…”
Section: Academic Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is generally accepted that testing accommodations have a positive effect on performance as they improve motivation especially for students with disabilities (E. Feldman et al, 2011), yet research on their impact for students with ADHD and with learning disability was not consistent (Jansen et al, 2019; Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). These results focus attention on the implicit theories that the students hold on the effectiveness, fairness, and appropriateness of such accommodations, which may play an important role in predicting their outcomes (Einav et al, 2018).…”
Section: Academic Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, students themselves refrain from requesting support or accommodations, due to their anxieties about being labeled or misunderstood by their lecturer and peers (Lightner et al, 2012). Some struggling students choose to bypass academic support centers and refuse to participate in a formal diagnostic process due to the financial costs, fear of stigmatization, and/or the complicated bureaucratic processes required for obtaining accommodations (Moriña, 2017;Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). Many previous studies ignored the situation of students with undiagnosed academic difficulties, usually relying instead on a dichotomous comparison between students with and without diagnosed SLD and/or ADHD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet not all students with academic difficulties are recognized as having a specific disability. Several explanations can be proposed for the tendency of many students to avoid receiving a formal diagnosis of their difficulties, something that results in their having to struggle with learning challenges without the benefit of various resources they might be entitled to (Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). Many students express concern and disappointment regarding the quality and quantity of support they are offered when facing academic difficulties (Marshak et al, 2010; Scott, 2019).…”
This study examined the predictive role of learning difficulties in the academic self-efficacy of students enrolled in higher education institutions and the serial multiple mediation of inner and external resources. The sample consisted of 2,113 students (age range = 18–35) at 25 higher education institutions in Israel. Participants were divided into four groups: (a) 668 typical students (without learning difficulties or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), (b) 370 students with self-reported but undiagnosed academic difficulties, (c) 372 students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLDs), and (d) 703 students diagnosed with attention deficit disorders (ADHD). Implicit theories on accommodations, perceptions of social support, hope, and academic self-efficacy were examined. Results demonstrated that students with SLD and ADHD had higher beliefs in the value of expectations, yet they experienced lower levels of academic self-efficacy than their typical peers. These implicit theories did not predict directly the academic self-efficacy, but external resources (perceptions of support) and internal resources (hope) mediated these relationships. The results focused on the accommodations and beliefs in their value for predicting academic self-efficacy, and the importance of social support and hope.
“…While there is a wide consensus regarding the right of students with disabilities to receive the same testing opportunities as their peers (Fuchs et al, 2005), the impact of testing accommodations on students' self-beliefs and achievements and on classroom climate requires further examination (Lovett, 2014;Lovett & Leja, 2013). Indeed, it is generally accepted that testing accommodations have a positive effect on performance as they improve motivation especially for students with disabilities (E. Feldman et al, 2011), yet research on their impact for students with ADHD and with learning disability was not consistent (Jansen et al, 2019;Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). These results focus attention on the implicit theories that the students hold on the effectiveness, fairness, and appropriateness of such accommodations, which may play an important role in predicting their outcomes (Einav et al, 2018).…”
Section: Academic Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is generally accepted that testing accommodations have a positive effect on performance as they improve motivation especially for students with disabilities (E. Feldman et al, 2011), yet research on their impact for students with ADHD and with learning disability was not consistent (Jansen et al, 2019; Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). These results focus attention on the implicit theories that the students hold on the effectiveness, fairness, and appropriateness of such accommodations, which may play an important role in predicting their outcomes (Einav et al, 2018).…”
Section: Academic Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, students themselves refrain from requesting support or accommodations, due to their anxieties about being labeled or misunderstood by their lecturer and peers (Lightner et al, 2012). Some struggling students choose to bypass academic support centers and refuse to participate in a formal diagnostic process due to the financial costs, fear of stigmatization, and/or the complicated bureaucratic processes required for obtaining accommodations (Moriña, 2017;Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). Many previous studies ignored the situation of students with undiagnosed academic difficulties, usually relying instead on a dichotomous comparison between students with and without diagnosed SLD and/or ADHD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet not all students with academic difficulties are recognized as having a specific disability. Several explanations can be proposed for the tendency of many students to avoid receiving a formal diagnosis of their difficulties, something that results in their having to struggle with learning challenges without the benefit of various resources they might be entitled to (Waterfield & Whelan, 2017). Many students express concern and disappointment regarding the quality and quantity of support they are offered when facing academic difficulties (Marshak et al, 2010; Scott, 2019).…”
This study examined the predictive role of learning difficulties in the academic self-efficacy of students enrolled in higher education institutions and the serial multiple mediation of inner and external resources. The sample consisted of 2,113 students (age range = 18–35) at 25 higher education institutions in Israel. Participants were divided into four groups: (a) 668 typical students (without learning difficulties or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), (b) 370 students with self-reported but undiagnosed academic difficulties, (c) 372 students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLDs), and (d) 703 students diagnosed with attention deficit disorders (ADHD). Implicit theories on accommodations, perceptions of social support, hope, and academic self-efficacy were examined. Results demonstrated that students with SLD and ADHD had higher beliefs in the value of expectations, yet they experienced lower levels of academic self-efficacy than their typical peers. These implicit theories did not predict directly the academic self-efficacy, but external resources (perceptions of support) and internal resources (hope) mediated these relationships. The results focused on the accommodations and beliefs in their value for predicting academic self-efficacy, and the importance of social support and hope.
“…While physical disabilities are reported regularly, students with LDs (most of whom are dyslexic) often go unidentified. This is because in post-secondary education, students are required to self-disclose, and many have never been formally diagnosed, do not think they need to receive support, or fear being stigmatized (Griful-Freixenet et al, 2020;LDA, 2012;Lindsay et al, 2018;MacCullagh et al, 2016;NJCLD, 2011;Proctor et al, 2017;Sniatecki et al, 2018;Waterfield and Whelan, 2017). One large-scale analysis of 63,802 undergraduates at 11 four-year research universities showed that 5.96% self-reported an LD, and only about one-third of those reported receiving accommodations (McGregor et al, 2016).…”
Section: Learning Disabilities In Post-secondary Institutionsmentioning
The number of students with learning disabilities in post-secondary institutions has grown substantially, and those with dyslexia compile the largest subgroup. This study explores the utility conceptualization of dyslexia by analyzing the subjective experiences of 30 students from two 2-year institutions. Interviews confirmed that these students exhibited dyslexic traits, and the study findings indicated that they used a variety of approaches to succeed academically despite a perceived disability. None of the strategies used were related to repairing a phonological deficit. Instead, these students relied on the development of compensatory skills, e.g., internal strengths, to improve experiences and maximize learning performances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.