1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.1976.tb00008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Disabilities and Learning Problems: Their Implications for the Juvenile Justice System

Abstract: Over the past thirty years, considerable time and effort have been expended and a great deal of money has been spent on the study of learning disabilities and learning problemstheir causes, effects, and possible remedies. For the purposes of this discussion, learning disabilities may be defined as perceptual handicaps, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia. A learning disabled child is not mentally retarded; hidher IQ range may compare favorably with that of hidher peers,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across several decades, research has consistently shown a high prevalence of youth with developmental disabilities in the juvenile justice system (Bernstein & Rulo, 1976;Fredericks, 1995;Moffitt, 1990;Quinn, Rutherford, Leone, Osher, & Poirier, 2005). In fact, disabilities are more than three times higher among justice-involved youth than the general population-approximately 65% to 70% of justice-involved youth meet disability criteria (Diaz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across several decades, research has consistently shown a high prevalence of youth with developmental disabilities in the juvenile justice system (Bernstein & Rulo, 1976;Fredericks, 1995;Moffitt, 1990;Quinn, Rutherford, Leone, Osher, & Poirier, 2005). In fact, disabilities are more than three times higher among justice-involved youth than the general population-approximately 65% to 70% of justice-involved youth meet disability criteria (Diaz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%