Handbook of Psychology 2003
DOI: 10.1002/0471264385.wei0718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Disabilities

Abstract: Siegel describes issues and controversies related to current and newly proposed definitions of learning disabilities that include the use of intelligence as diagnostic criteria. Several critical controversies and questions are reviewed concerning whether learning disabilities is a specific, possibly neurologic type dysfunction and whether there are multiple subtypes of learning disabilities, specific to academic problem domains. In subsequent sections, research on reading and arithmetic disabilities and a desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This system of classifying the RD group using low achievement scores was used as there is little or no evidence to support the validity of the IQ‐discrepancy model (Fletcher et al, 1994) and the purpose was to identify children with reading problems as opposed to a reading disability per se. A cut‐off of 90 has been used previously in the research and may be a more appropriate cut‐off with this age group (Bruck, 1992; Fletcher et al, 1998; Frankenberger & Fronzaglio, 1991; Siegel & Heaven, 1986). Spelling scores were also included as an indicator of overall reading problems due to the extensive literature demonstrating that spelling is just as much an indicator of literacy and language‐based skills as reading (Burt & Fury, 2000; Kamhi & Hinton, 2000) and has been shown to be one phenotypic marker of dyslexia (Petryshen et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system of classifying the RD group using low achievement scores was used as there is little or no evidence to support the validity of the IQ‐discrepancy model (Fletcher et al, 1994) and the purpose was to identify children with reading problems as opposed to a reading disability per se. A cut‐off of 90 has been used previously in the research and may be a more appropriate cut‐off with this age group (Bruck, 1992; Fletcher et al, 1998; Frankenberger & Fronzaglio, 1991; Siegel & Heaven, 1986). Spelling scores were also included as an indicator of overall reading problems due to the extensive literature demonstrating that spelling is just as much an indicator of literacy and language‐based skills as reading (Burt & Fury, 2000; Kamhi & Hinton, 2000) and has been shown to be one phenotypic marker of dyslexia (Petryshen et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cut off of SS 90 has been used previously in the research literature (Bruck, 1992;Fletcher et al, 1998;Frankenberger & Fronzaglio, 1991;Siegel & Heaven, 1986). It should be noted that this criterion is not as rigorous as that currently used to make a diagnosis of Learning Disability within the school system.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitional issues are very complex ones and have been reviewed by Fletcher (1992), Siegel (1989aSiegel ( , 1989b, Siegel and Heaven (1986), and Vellutino (1979). In the present study, we used the definition of LD based on work by Rourke (1991); Rourke and Tsatsanis (1996); Rourke and Finlayson (1978); Rourke et al (1990);Siegel (1988aSiegel ( , 1988bSiegel ( , 1989aSiegel ( , 1989bSiegel ( , 1990aSiegel ( , 1991aSiegel ( , 1992Siegel ( , 1993aSiegel ( , 1994Siegel ( , 1998and Siegel and Heaven (1986). In this conceptualization, LD is defined as a significant problem in reading or arithmetic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%