2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.65456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning differentially shapes prefrontal and hippocampal activity during classical conditioning

Abstract: The ability to use sensory cues to inform goal directed actions is a critical component of behavior. To study how sounds guide anticipatory licking during classical conditioning, we employed high-density electrophysiological recordings from the hippocampal CA1 area and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in mice. CA1 and PFC neurons undergo distinct learning dependent changes at the single cell level and maintain representations of cue identity at the population level. In addition, reactivation of task-related neurona… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S5G). It seems that the presence of coordinated activity between those two areas may vary according to the type and period of the task (e.g., sleep, sharp-wave ripples, sensory encoding), which would explain previous work showing both dependent Jadhav et al (2016), Peyrache et al (2009), Shin et al (2019) and independent (Kaefer et al (2020), Klee et al (2021)) co-activation of neuronal patterns in those areas. In our case, any relevant interplay between those two areas during the late stimulus or trace period could not be captured by HMM states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure S5G). It seems that the presence of coordinated activity between those two areas may vary according to the type and period of the task (e.g., sleep, sharp-wave ripples, sensory encoding), which would explain previous work showing both dependent Jadhav et al (2016), Peyrache et al (2009), Shin et al (2019) and independent (Kaefer et al (2020), Klee et al (2021)) co-activation of neuronal patterns in those areas. In our case, any relevant interplay between those two areas during the late stimulus or trace period could not be captured by HMM states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We previously developed an appetitive trace conditioning task (Klee et al, 2021) which trained mice to differentiate between two sound stimuli (conditioned stimulus: CS+ and CS-;Figure 1A). In each CS+ trial, the 2s stimulus was followed by a 1s delay (trace period), and a reward delivered in a water port.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Training animals to associate a particular sound (conditioned stimulus) with a subsequent reward or punishment (unconditioned stimulus) elicits changes in hippocampal activity over the course of learning (see Supplementary Table D). Different hippocampal synapses are modified in strength through long term potentiation (for a review see Gruart et al, 2015), leading to changes in firing rates that come to differentiate sounds that have been associated with value from those that have not (Berger et al, 1976;Disterhoft and Segal, 1978;Klee et al, 2021;Olds and Hirano, 1969). Such differential responses can arise between tones of different frequencies, or between more complex sounds such as artificial vowels with different formant structure (Itskov et al, 2012).…”
Section: Activity During Conditioning To Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hippocampal–cortical interactions have been widely studied with the aim of understanding their role in supporting memory [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Yet, most studies have focused on the interplay between the hippocampus and selected cortical areas with major anatomical connections to the hippocampus, such as the entorhinal or the medial prefrontal cortex [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Less is known about the interrelation between hippocampal activity and activity phenomena spanning large portions of cortical space [ 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%