2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning dictionary on manifolds for image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is helpful for SR that similar samples constitutionally exist in the same subspace while heterogeneous samples potentially lie in different subspaces. In high-dimensional case, the overcomplete features spontaneously result in the small overlap between t S and other subspaces even the disjoined subspaces and thus promote SR to deliver the believable neighbor selection of t, which is supported by the studies of [35,55]. However, as the difference value m d − decreases, the overlap between t S and other subspaces increases and thereby gives rise to the unreliability of neighbor selection by SR.…”
Section: Analysis Of Srmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, it is helpful for SR that similar samples constitutionally exist in the same subspace while heterogeneous samples potentially lie in different subspaces. In high-dimensional case, the overcomplete features spontaneously result in the small overlap between t S and other subspaces even the disjoined subspaces and thus promote SR to deliver the believable neighbor selection of t, which is supported by the studies of [35,55]. However, as the difference value m d − decreases, the overlap between t S and other subspaces increases and thereby gives rise to the unreliability of neighbor selection by SR.…”
Section: Analysis Of Srmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Single scale SIFT ScSPM(1024) [40,6] 82.74 ± 1.46 80.28 ± 0.93 EMK [1] 74.56 ± 1.32 NA KSR [4] 84.92 ± 0.78 83.68 ± 0.61 SCSR(1024) [17] 87.97 ± 1.11 81.51 ± 0.32 DLSM(1024) [18] 86.82 ± 1.04 83.40 ± 0.44 DLMM(1024) [18] 86 we call multiple scales SIFT. 128 dimensional SIFT descriptors are obtained and normalized to 1 with 2 -norm.…”
Section: Uiuc-sports Scene 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example task is image classification [18,19,40], which aims to associate images with semantic labels automatically. The most common framework is the discriminative model [12,38,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 shows the results, on the Caltech256 dataset, of the 1 BRD, the competing histogram distances, the logistic regression, the method in [12], the method based on the dictionary learning on single manifold (DLSM) in [47], the method based on the dictionary learning on multiple manifolds (DLMM) in [47], and the method in [11]. The experimental setups for the different histogram distances are exactly the same to avoid bias.…”
Section: Global Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%