2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning deformable registration of medical images with anatomical constraints

Abstract: Deformable image registration is a fundamental problem in the field of medical image analysis. During the last years, we have witnessed the advent of deep learning-based image registration methods which achieve state-of-the-art performance, and drastically reduce the required computational time. However, little work has been done regarding how can we encourage our models to produce not only accurate, but also anatomically plausible results, which is still an open question in the field. In this work, we argue t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This illustrates the limits of simplistic metrics to reflect anatomic improvements in the image generation process. It is expected that more specific losses based on learnt representations could reflect this improvement [20]. The U-Net and the adversarial networks fail to generalize the upper section of the body where less training data were available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates the limits of simplistic metrics to reflect anatomic improvements in the image generation process. It is expected that more specific losses based on learnt representations could reflect this improvement [20]. The U-Net and the adversarial networks fail to generalize the upper section of the body where less training data were available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the CTA-SPECT registration was evaluated for both of the registration methods with and without the whole heart constraint using the Dice similarity coefficient (30,31) to assess the overlap of the tracer and LV myocardium, and the Hausdorff distance (30,31) to assess the distance of the boundaries after performing the registration. The CTA-SPECT registration method was applied to both the minipig and patient data.…”
Section: Multimodality Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for x-ray images, there are six publicly available datasets, NLST [111], NIH ChestXray14 [116], OAI, JSRT [117], Montgomery County x-ray database [118] and Shenzhen Hospital x-ray database [118]. However, there are relatively few studies on x-ray image registration [25,80], compared with MRI and CT.…”
Section: Ultrasound Registration and X-ray Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%