2018
DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning curves in surgery: variables, analysis and applications

Abstract: Learning curves graphically represent the relationship between learning effort and learning outcome. Learning curves are increasingly used in research, the design of randomised controlled trials, the assessment of competency, healthcare education and training programme design. In this review we have outlined the principles behind plotting learning curves, described the common methods used to analyse learning curves, how to interpret learning curves, the multitude of learning models, their applications and pote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used an adaptation of a segmented linear regression technique previously published by one of the authors (EMV) in the context of learning curve modelling [9, 13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used an adaptation of a segmented linear regression technique previously published by one of the authors (EMV) in the context of learning curve modelling [9, 13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other methods for modelling learning curves do exist ( e.g ., cumulative sum methods), the widespread use of mathematically valid regression techniques in orthopaedics remains sparse[16]. Researchers have recently developed mathematically rigorous segmented linear regression techniques that test multiple learning models and applied these to investigate the learning curves austerity across healthcare systems of total knee and total hip replacements when using imageless navigation[17,18] (Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group comparison is generally considered unreliable as it can be influenced by secular trends which are often too subtle to detect by data inspection alone [3]. By accommodating for temporal trends, ITS enables more reliable conclusions but can suffer from bias because its application is focused on a designated point in time (usually the point of the intervention).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%