2014
DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2014.996113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning curves for cardiothoracic and vascular surgical procedures – a systematic review

Abstract: LCs in cardiothoracic and vascular procedures are hugely variable depending on the procedure type, outcome measures, level of prior experience, and methods/statistics used. Uniformity in methods, variables, and statistical analysis is needed to derive meaningful comparisons of LCs. Acknowledgment and application of learning processes other than those reliant on volume-outcomes relationship will benefit LC research and training of surgeons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning curve of cardiothoracic and vascular surgical procedures has been summarized in a total of 48 studies, as Arora et al reported in their systematic review. 38 Based on operating time, the learning curve for coronary artery bypass surgery ranged between 15 and 100 cases; for endoscopic vessel harvesting and other cardiac vessel surgery, between 7 and 35 cases; for valvular surgery, which included repair and replacement, between 20 and 135 cases; for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, between 15 and 35 cases; for vascular neurosurgical procedures, between 100 and 500 cases, based on complications; for endovascular vessel repairs, between 5 and 40 cases; and for ablation procedures, between 25 and 60 cases. The authors concluded that the learning curves for cardiothoracic and vascular procedures varied depending on the procedure and the level of experience of the clinician.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning curve of cardiothoracic and vascular surgical procedures has been summarized in a total of 48 studies, as Arora et al reported in their systematic review. 38 Based on operating time, the learning curve for coronary artery bypass surgery ranged between 15 and 100 cases; for endoscopic vessel harvesting and other cardiac vessel surgery, between 7 and 35 cases; for valvular surgery, which included repair and replacement, between 20 and 135 cases; for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, between 15 and 35 cases; for vascular neurosurgical procedures, between 100 and 500 cases, based on complications; for endovascular vessel repairs, between 5 and 40 cases; and for ablation procedures, between 25 and 60 cases. The authors concluded that the learning curves for cardiothoracic and vascular procedures varied depending on the procedure and the level of experience of the clinician.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning curve of for multi-port VATS has been described as variable and vague in previous publications (13,14). To minimize the potential bias to the study, the surgical videos of the uniportal VATS lobectomy were reviewed to determine the procedure-specific duration, which was recorded from the beginning of hilum dissection until removal of the specimen, excluding the time for thoracoscopic adhesiolysis and mediastinal lymph node dissection, which was unpredictable and varied significantly from procedure to procedure (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trainees in microsurgery find themselves faced with a steep learning curve to acquire and develop their operative skills. The surgical learning curve is an improvement in trainee-surgeon's performance over time as a result of new motor skills acquisition (Arora et al 2015). Technical expertize is broadly proportional to overall experience, and early exposure with appropriate high-quality training and repeated practice is essential (Sadideen & Kneebone 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%