2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08165-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning curve of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our evaluation of the LC of a simple surgical technique excluded the effects of differences, such as surgical team performance or docking the da Vinci robotic system, other than operative or console time. Reports of completed LC for R‐TAPP by expert surgeons in L‐TAPP varied from 25 to 139 cases, but the majority of studies reported 30–50 cases, similar to our results 13–18 . We also performed 50 cases of RG during the same period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our evaluation of the LC of a simple surgical technique excluded the effects of differences, such as surgical team performance or docking the da Vinci robotic system, other than operative or console time. Reports of completed LC for R‐TAPP by expert surgeons in L‐TAPP varied from 25 to 139 cases, but the majority of studies reported 30–50 cases, similar to our results 13–18 . We also performed 50 cases of RG during the same period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Reports of completed LC for R‐TAPP by expert surgeons in L‐TAPP varied from 25 to 139 cases, but the majority of studies reported 30–50 cases, similar to our results. 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 We also performed 50 cases of RG during the same period. The LC in our report may be skewed, as it does not take into account the proficiency gained from using the robotic system in RG interspersed with R‐TAPP procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 , 48 Beyond orthopedics, CUSUM-based operative learning curves have reported to be approximately 30 cases for robot-assisted colorectal surgery, approximately 50 cases in surgical resection of advanced ovarian cancer, and 43 cases for robot-assisted transabdominal preperiotoneal repair of inguinal hernias. 31 , 37 , 43 Notably, the CUSUM learning curve for operative time is shorter than complication rate for the two surgeons in our series while no learning curve for patient reported outcomes was reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The learning curve of r-TAPP is steep and the described reductions in surgery time are proof of the rapid and intuitive adoption of the advantages of robotics [27,28]. In a study of r-TAPP from Italy, it was calculated that after 43 r-TAPPs operated by experienced surgeons, the learning curve reached the plateau (from 70 to 61 min; [29]). The r-TAPP learning curve of the European pioneer of robotic hernia repair Filip Muysoms from Belgium, shows similar results: in one year the operating time (incision-to-skin-closure) was reduced from 80 to 60 min; in Muysoms et al the average console time for unilateral hernias is 43 min (total operating time 94 min), for bilateral hernias 65 min (total operating time 119 min; [27]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%