2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00052-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning curve for the detection of axillary sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapid identification of the SLN in patients with NSCLC should improve as thoracic surgeons become more familiar with the technique, similar to what has occurred in other tumor types. 42,43 The current study data indicate that RT-PCR for CK7 is a highly sensitive marker for NSCLC. The use of a single tube for the entire nested RT-PCR assay decreases the risk of false-positive results that arise from contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Rapid identification of the SLN in patients with NSCLC should improve as thoracic surgeons become more familiar with the technique, similar to what has occurred in other tumor types. 42,43 The current study data indicate that RT-PCR for CK7 is a highly sensitive marker for NSCLC. The use of a single tube for the entire nested RT-PCR assay decreases the risk of false-positive results that arise from contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this analysis, patients undergoing SNB have a 22% higher odds ratio of having a positive node, a finding that is likely to be due to the more intensive pathologic examination using multiple sections and immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is employed to evaluate the sentinel node and which makes detection of malignant cells more likely [17]. Whilst it is clear that there is a false negative rate associated with identification of incorrect nodes as the sentinel node or failure to identify all of the sentinel nodes, this source of false negative results decreases with increasing experience of the surgeon [18]. In contrast, the false negative rate seen with axillary dissection is due to the inability of the pathologist to perform serial sections and IHC on the 20-30 lymph nodes found in an axillary dissection specimen and is not anticipated to decrease, leading us to believe that the staging advantage for SNB observed in this study is likely to increase in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential limitation is that the results of recently launched randomized studies were not available to include in the meta-analysis, and data from some published studies could not be extracted. It is also possible that despite some initial training, surgeons may have been developing skills in SNB during the studies included, so the morbidity may reflect still some part of the ''learning curve'' in this procedure [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans cette étude, une seule ponction était nécessaire dans le GS, contre une à sept ponctions dans le groupe CA. Classe et al [27] rapportent un taux de sérome de 11 %, après prélèvement du GS. Purushotham et al [28] confirment ces mêmes taux (21 % versus 14 %) dans une étude randomisée contrôlée portant sur 298 patientes.…”
Section: Prévention Peropératoire De La Formation Des Séromesunclassified