2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Curve for Metastatic Liver Tumor Open Resection in Patients with Primary Colorectal Cancer: Use of the Cumulative Sum Method

Abstract: Background: Liver resections have become the first-line treatment for primary and metastatic tumors and, therefore, are considered a core aspect of surgical training. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the extent and safety of liver resection procedures for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: This single tertiary center retrospective analysis includes 158 consecutive cases of small liver resection (SLR) (n = 107) and major liver resection (MLR) (n = 58) procedures. A cumulative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open and minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery requires a well-trained surgeon and specific competences [ 65 ]. Nevertheless, minor liver resections could be performed by general surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Open and minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery requires a well-trained surgeon and specific competences [ 65 ]. Nevertheless, minor liver resections could be performed by general surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, minor liver resections could be performed by general surgeons. Therefore, we would like to underline that minor and major resections either in open and minimally invasive surgery need a different learning curve, according to literature [ 65 ]. Indeed, operative time and blood loss, are often used as learning curve predictive factors, but they are not matched to the patients’ characteristics, post operative complications, and tumor locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) age 18 years or above, (2) primary HCC or ICC in histopathological reports, and (3) no previous liver surgeries; cases with missing data were excluded. As described in detail in our prior paper, the end points analyzed were following: (1) operating time measured from skin incision to skin closure; (2) intraoperative blood loss level, defined as blood volume removed by suction; (3) post-operative hospital stay length from the first post-operative day to the hospital discharge date [14]. All of the performed procedures were classified as left or right hemihepatectomies, according to the Brisbane 2000 Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resections [18], and were considered as major liver resections.…”
Section: Patients and Procedures Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grade I-IIIa complications included (1) wound infection, (2) prolonged hospital stay (>10 days), and (3) hematoma managed non-surgically. Grade IIIb-Ivb complications were as follows: (1) patient death, (2) admission to the intensive care unit, (3) reoperation due to intraperitoneal bleeding, (4) wound dehiscence requiring resuturing under general anesthesia, (5) hepatobiliary fistula requiring relaparotomy, and (6) post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) [14,19]. PHLF was defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgeries (ISGLS) consensus [20].…”
Section: Patients and Procedures Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation