2021
DOI: 10.1145/3476576.3476703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning contact corrections for handle-based subspace dynamics

Abstract: Fig. 1. The left images show a dynamic simulation of an FEM Neo-Hookean jelly with 12,469 triangles. The deformation is rich but slow (20 fps). The central images show the same scene using a linear subspace model built with just 8 point handles. The simulation is fast (420 fps), but it misses all the detail and suffers distortion under moderate forces. The right images show the result with our model, which augments the linear model with nonlinear learning-based corrections. We retain fast dynamics close to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods focus on a single mesh, or a set of variations of the same mesh [Bogo et al 2014;Osman et al 2020;Varol et al 2017;Zuffi et al 2017], and define an arbitrary fixed correspondence of vertices and/or faces to the entries of a predicted tensor, thereby enabling machine learning algorithms to associate predicted quantities to geometric elements. This enables treating the input and output as general tensors of a homogeneous dataset and applying off-the-shelf tools for data analysis, such as Principal Component Analysis [Anguelov et al 2005], Gaussian Mixture Models [Bogo et al 2016], as well as neural networks, which assign per-vertex coordinates [Shen et al 2021] or offsets from a simpler (e.g., linear) model [Bailey et al 2020[Bailey et al , 2018Romero et al 2021;Yin et al 2021;Zheng et al 2021]. As they are not shape-aware in the sense discussed in Section 1, such methods often need to add additional regularizers such as ARAP [Sun et al 2021] or the Laplacian [Kanazawa et al 2018].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many methods focus on a single mesh, or a set of variations of the same mesh [Bogo et al 2014;Osman et al 2020;Varol et al 2017;Zuffi et al 2017], and define an arbitrary fixed correspondence of vertices and/or faces to the entries of a predicted tensor, thereby enabling machine learning algorithms to associate predicted quantities to geometric elements. This enables treating the input and output as general tensors of a homogeneous dataset and applying off-the-shelf tools for data analysis, such as Principal Component Analysis [Anguelov et al 2005], Gaussian Mixture Models [Bogo et al 2016], as well as neural networks, which assign per-vertex coordinates [Shen et al 2021] or offsets from a simpler (e.g., linear) model [Bailey et al 2020[Bailey et al , 2018Romero et al 2021;Yin et al 2021;Zheng et al 2021]. As they are not shape-aware in the sense discussed in Section 1, such methods often need to add additional regularizers such as ARAP [Sun et al 2021] or the Laplacian [Kanazawa et al 2018].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning collision handling. We compare our method to [Romero et al 2021] on collision handling, using their data to train and test. Predictions are overlaid over the ground-truth in the zoom-ins.…”
Section: Physical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deep simulation methods have emerged as popular alternatives to traditional numerical calculation methods owing to the rapid development of deep learning techniques. These methods [ 1 – 4 ] use the ability of neural networks to learn nonlinear functions to propose differentiable models that output deformable objects as functions of the target shape, pose, motion, and other design parameters. However, these methods perform poorly in collision detection and response (CDR), which has a significant impact on visual realism and simulation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nonlinear elastic deformation, Holden et al [ 1 ] combined subspace simulation techniques with machine learning to support interactions with external objects. Romero et al [ 4 ] used a model formula with nonlinear corrections applied to the local undeformable setting and decoupled internal and external contact-driven corrections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%