2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning constitutive relations using symmetric positive definite neural networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as well as open-cell topologies. Finally, instead of training the symmetric part of the stiffness tensor, one can try to predict the Cholesky factor of a tangent stiffness matrix to impose a weak convexity on the strain energy function [91]. The latter point is specifically interesting when it comes to non-linear material behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as open-cell topologies. Finally, instead of training the symmetric part of the stiffness tensor, one can try to predict the Cholesky factor of a tangent stiffness matrix to impose a weak convexity on the strain energy function [91]. The latter point is specifically interesting when it comes to non-linear material behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of machine learning techniques in recent years, especially deep learning, has provided new tools to extract complicated relationships from massive data in an efficient and flexible way, thus a new possibility to data-driven constitutive modeling. In light of such strengths and promises, many machine learning-based constitutive models have been developed in the past few years in a wide range of application areas such as turbulence modeling [1][2][3][4][5][6] and computational mechanics [7][8][9][10][11][12] in general.…”
Section: A Invariance Properties Of Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the influential works of Wu and Ghaboussi (1990); Ghaboussi et al (1990Ghaboussi et al ( , 1991 for concrete in a small-strain biaxial state of stress, these tools have been employed for different material models with increasing complexity over the years (Lefik and Schrefler, 2003;Jung and Ghaboussi, 2006;Huang et al, 2020;Fuhg et al, 2021a;Lu et al, 2021;Logarzo et al, 2021). Recently, in the hope of needing less data and in order to generate models with higher generalization capability, efforts have been made to train data-driven constitutive models that do not only train with raw stress-strain data but incorporate additional physics-based restrictions to the trained model (Liu and Wu, 2019;Heider et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021;Linka et al, 2021). When dealing with hyperelastic materials, where no rate-dependence is considered, these models try to include some of the following physics-informed principles:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea behind physics-informed or physics-guided data-driven constitutive models is that the trained surrogate should abide to these conditions and not rely solely on raw data. Additionally, a large majority of the proposed works in the literature for physics-guided constitutive models are based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) (Liu and Wu, 2019;Heider et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021;Masi et al, 2021). For general information about ANNs we refer to Goodfellow et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%