2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10290-006-0083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning-by-Exporting: Continuous Productivity Improvements or Capacity Utilization Effects? Evidence from Slovenian Firms

Abstract: Firm heterogeneity, exports, learning-by-exporting, difference-in-differences, matching,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
62
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
62
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The industry-speci…c average treatment e¤ects for both the exporting and innovation equation are presented in Table A1 in Appendix. 13 With some notable exceptions, we can see that in majority of industries average treatment e¤ects of the export equation reveal that innovators are more likely to be also exporters, 14 while, similarly, the innovation equation, by and large, con…rms that lagged exporting status has a signi…cant impact on innovation. , , indicate statistical signi…cance at 10%, 5% and 1% level of signi…cance, respectively.…”
Section: Matching Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The industry-speci…c average treatment e¤ects for both the exporting and innovation equation are presented in Table A1 in Appendix. 13 With some notable exceptions, we can see that in majority of industries average treatment e¤ects of the export equation reveal that innovators are more likely to be also exporters, 14 while, similarly, the innovation equation, by and large, con…rms that lagged exporting status has a signi…cant impact on innovation. , , indicate statistical signi…cance at 10%, 5% and 1% level of signi…cance, respectively.…”
Section: Matching Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Among other determinants of exporting status (as suggested in the relevant literature) we also include log of labor productivity (value addded per employee), which captures the possibility that more productive …rms self-select into exporting. Size measured by log number of employees appears as a determinant of both innovation as well as exporting status (Love and Roper, 2002;Barrios et al, 2003;Damijan and Kostevc, 2006). Inclusion of capital intensity and investment in R&D (both in logs) is necessary since …rms with higher capital to labor ratios and greater investments in R&D are more likely to be able to compete in highly competitive mature markets.…”
Section: Bivariate Probit Regressions 411 Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Salomon & Shaver (2005), indicate that exporters may learn from their foreign contacts, adopting new production technologies and thereby increasing their productivity and performance. However, the most unanimous conclusion is that exporters have higher productivity than non-exporters before starting the internationalization process, and no significant productivity advantages are observed among continuous exporters or non-exporting firms respectively over time (Aw, Chen, & Roberts, 2001;Bernard & Jensen, 1999;Damijan & Kostevc, 2006;Delgado et al, 2002;Fafchamps, El Hamine, & Zeufack, 2007;Greenaway & Kneller, 2007) 13 . Therefore, again, the unanimous direction of causality is not that internationalization brings about an increase in 12 The transaction costs and time involved in international sales increase because companies need to find the market information they do not yet possess, promote a brand usually still unknown in the target country, develop the distribution networks, and so on.…”
Section: Studies That Conclude That Innovation Favors Internationalizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start with the cohort of …rms that have innovated for the …rst time in period t (separately for product and process innovators 21 ), hence did not innovate in either t 1 nor t 2, but have been importers from at least t 1 onwards. All of the included …rms did not engage in exports in either of the three periods in question (t 2; t 1, and t).…”
Section: Appendix Econometric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%