1998
DOI: 10.2307/2527396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning by Doing, the Technology Gap, and Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The sources of these knowledge spillovers include, on the one hand, incentives for technological improvements, labor training, and more efficient management due to increased international competition and, on the other, direct access to foreign knowledge through relationships with foreign buyers (Chuang 1998).…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of these knowledge spillovers include, on the one hand, incentives for technological improvements, labor training, and more efficient management due to increased international competition and, on the other, direct access to foreign knowledge through relationships with foreign buyers (Chuang 1998).…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Export activity may not only generate financial benefits for the firm, but can also be viewed as a process of learning and of accumulation of knowledge and technology (Blalock and Gertler 2004;Yeoh 2004). The economics literature suggests a ''learning-by-exporting'' effect (Blalock and Gertler 2004;Branstetter 2006;Chuang 1998), andMcDougall (1994) argue that international new ventures are also likely to enjoy advantages of knowledge generation through internationalization. In particular, it is suggested that internationalization is a source of competitive advantage through which new ventures are able to access resources and thus expand their resource base (Autio 2005;Kuemmerle 1999Kuemmerle , 2002Oviatt and McDougall 1994).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, import might facilitate learning about the products (for example, reverse engineering), spurring imitation or innovation of competing products. Thus, countries import new goods first, then produce them by themselves, and eventually export them (Chuang, 1998 …”
Section: International Letters Of Social and Humanistic Sciences Vol 49mentioning
confidence: 99%