2005
DOI: 10.1007/11566489_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Based Non-rigid Multi-modal Image Registration Using Kullback-Leibler Divergence

Abstract: Abstract. The need for non-rigid multi-modal registration is becoming increasingly common for many clinical applications. To date, however, existing proposed techniques remain as largely academic research effort with very few methods being validated for clinical product use. It has been suggested by Crum et al. [1] that the context-free nature of these methods is one of the main limitations and that moving towards context-specific methods by incorporating prior knowledge of the underlying registration problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as a section of experiments in [6], the superiority of KLD over Mutual Information (MI) measure was demonstrated for 2D/3D registration. Learning-based method was further extended to 2D non-rigid image registration in [7] where the KLD w.r.t. a prior joint distribution was minimized together with the maximization of the MI measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as a section of experiments in [6], the superiority of KLD over Mutual Information (MI) measure was demonstrated for 2D/3D registration. Learning-based method was further extended to 2D non-rigid image registration in [7] where the KLD w.r.t. a prior joint distribution was minimized together with the maximization of the MI measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we are deriving a new registration method considering those aspects. The achieved accuracy of the proposed approach, that exploits prior information from cardiac SPECT/CT acquisitions, is compared to the accuracy of standard mutual information (MI) [10,11] and a general learning-based approach [7]. This work extends previous works with the focus of applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Decreasing the influence of MI allows to smooth out its local optima while still keeping the feature of maximizing the mutual information that both images share. In previous work [4,6,7,8] the KL divergence is used to measure the dissimilarity of two distributions. In a discrete formulation, this can be written as:…”
Section: Image Registration Using Prior Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations