2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning at the nano-level: Accounting for complexity in the internalization of secondary STEM teacher professional development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to limited preparation, teachers may not eagerly embrace the idea of teaching STEM content, and most of them are inclined to teach what they were taught (Deemer, 2004;Llinares & Krainer, 2006). To overcome the previous limitations, it is essential that future teachers engage in continuing education and professional development (Fore et al, 2015;Morrison, Raab, & Ingram, 2008;Nadelson et al, 2013;Tsai, 2006).…”
Section: Preparing Elementary School Teachers To Teach Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to limited preparation, teachers may not eagerly embrace the idea of teaching STEM content, and most of them are inclined to teach what they were taught (Deemer, 2004;Llinares & Krainer, 2006). To overcome the previous limitations, it is essential that future teachers engage in continuing education and professional development (Fore et al, 2015;Morrison, Raab, & Ingram, 2008;Nadelson et al, 2013;Tsai, 2006).…”
Section: Preparing Elementary School Teachers To Teach Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing teachers with continued support when they return to their classrooms can greatly impact their overall program success [7][4]. Additionally, understanding how and what teachers are implementing is vital in measuring and understanding the greater impact of the program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviews, conversations, and observations were the primary methods utilized to collect these data. The interview protocols, located in Appendix A and C of Fore, Feldhaus, Sorge, Agarwal, and Varahramyan [7], were consistent with the protocols used in this study. These protocols focused on teacher experiences of the RETAIN program and teacher concerns over school level constraints (e.g.…”
Section: A Assessment Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, planning for and carrying out TPD and allowing for its practical impact in the classroom can be challenging (See et al 2016;Tondeur et al 2016). For example, teachers' subjectivity largely influences the outcome of TPD (Fore et al 2015). Another example, using Håkansson Lindqvist's (2015b) arguments, is that time for and access to ICT-related TPD, combined with limited possibilities for teacher collaboration in schools to develop local digital teaching practices, are factors that influence how teachers use ICT for teaching and learning in upper secondary school.…”
Section: Reason 3: the Question Of Teachers' Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%